Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,378 posts)
Mon May 25, 2026, 01:00 PM 5 hrs ago

Why So Few Babies? We Might Have Overlooked the Biggest Reason of All

By Anna Louie Sussman

... overall, people are having fewer children both in countries that offer very little and in those renowned for their generous family benefits; moreover, the trend holds among those who are struggling to make ends meet and among those who, like the Riveras, have advanced degrees and salaried jobs. What unites these disparate cultures, policy environments and demographics, researchers are now realizing, is young people’s inescapable and crushing sense that the future is too uncertain for the lifelong commitment of parenthood. Call it the vibes theory of demographic decline.

The future has never been assured, but it feels as though we are living in a time of spectacular uncertainty. In the United States, job tenures have contracted and income volatility has risen. Life expectancy, once on an inexorable march upward, has fallen for less-educated women and men. Many of the forces our economy is built on — A.I., immigration, global trade — feel distressingly volatile; disruption, once a byword for a disturbance or problem, is the governing ethos of a terrifyingly powerful sector of our economy. The rise of prediction markets has turned the world into one large casino. The climate crisis is spiraling, as are the costs of everything that could enable parenthood, whether that’s a roof over one’s head or child care. The past half-century has brought us breathtaking inequality, accompanied by a sharp decline in social mobility. The two generations currently of childbearing age bear the psychological and financial scars of coming of age amid world-scale catastrophes: Older millennials entered the labor market during the Great Recession; many watched their parents lose their jobs or homes. Members of Gen Z, whose lives were upturned by the Covid-19 pandemic, now find themselves competing against A.I. for entry-level jobs and even prospective partners. The man running America seems single-mindedly devoted to chaos at home and abroad...

No existing demographic theory could explain the near uniformity of this decline across the continent, which continued irrespective of how deeply a country was affected by the recession or how swiftly it recovered. It became clear to Mr. Vignoli that structural factors such as employment status or the housing market, while important context, do not tell the whole story of where people see themselves in the future. Raising children is an inherently forward-looking project, and in Professor Vignoli’s analysis, increasing exposure to a volatile global economy and accelerating technological change make it hard for young people to project a path forward with even a modest degree of confidence...

Even proponents of the uncertainty theory acknowledge that there are plenty of other factors that contribute to the world’s declining birthrates. There has been a marked decline in marriage. Increased social isolation, to say nothing of what some have called a “sex recession,” certainly does not augur a baby boom. Nor do today’s employment prospects. Educated workers face what the economist Claudia Goldin has called “greedy jobs,” positions that demand far more of an employee than can be contained between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., while less-skilled workers cope with unpredictable shifts and wages that have barely kept pace with the cost of living. It’s hard to square either with the expectation that parents will invest huge amounts of time and money in their children’s development...Look hard enough, though, and many of those factors become forms of uncertainty too....

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/07/opinion/birthrate-kids-parents-demographics-future.html?unlocked_article_code=1.lFA.dvDj.9jMGEPpxjB8W&smid=url-share

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FoxNewsSucks

(11,937 posts)
1. Even if I were inclined to have wanted kids,
Mon May 25, 2026, 01:03 PM
5 hrs ago

there's NO WAY in hell I would bring a baby into today's world, and I've felt that way for a long time.

ancianita

(43,378 posts)
2. Totally understandable. Yours is the same reason my youngest son refuses to ever have children.
Mon May 25, 2026, 01:13 PM
4 hrs ago
Yet I believe that children can be miraculous under any conditions; that we have to see them that way.
Bernini's Life is Beautiful shows one way we can be with children, whether or not they're our own.

Midnight Writer

(25,798 posts)
4. The reason for so few babies is that people can now plan their families and avoid unwanted pregnancies.
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:26 PM
2 hrs ago

Having a child is an awesome responsibility, a lifetime obligation. Not only financially, but in every aspect of the parent's life.

If folks have the option of choosing how many children they have, most will try to stay within their financial and emotional means.

If conservatives want more babies, then they should make the burdens of parenthood less onerous. Instead, they are doing the opposite, encouraging the rich to suck every available dollar, every available minute from our lives.

Attilatheblond

(9,288 posts)
6. Maybe to some extent, but hope or no hope for the near future seems to matter greatly
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:55 PM
2 hrs ago

Boomer myself and growing up we did have to worry a lot about "THE BOMB" but otherwise, the future looked pretty rosy. Our parents won that war, science, and industry were making amazing leaps. Most communities could afford improving schools. The future looked pretty bright and my parents' generation had an overwhelming positive mental attitude about what all was going on. Thus, the 'baby boom'.

GI bill meant more education for more people and more education generally brings about more liberalism. Optimism and some increases in opportunity, even for the working class was the norm, even as we struggled in matters of racial justice and lifting boats peopled by neighbors of a different color. Social justice made some important strides even when the old money loathed the rocking of the yachts their old social norms stayed afloat in.

But, alas, the ultra rich didn't like the expansion of the middle class, the class that was building the rosy future. They hired politicians and strategists who would pontificate that greed was good and they could achieve and maintain power by dividing us rather than fostering better universal educational and vocational opportunities. Those jerks decided money and power for them was more important than decent futures for the masses. They decided to get us all fighting each other more and progressing less.

After a couple more generations of the rich encouraging self serving culture wars, less education, drastically eroding opportunities and the environment being savaged for immediate profit for the aging ultra rich feeling mortality's cold breath on their shoulders who didn't want to leave any personal profit making chance on the table, well, things are in the shitter now.

It's not just being able to avoid unwanted pregnancies that makes people in their childbearing years think 'nah, maybe not'. There is real, and justified fear that the future is not a good place for children.

NNadir

(38,592 posts)
5. We had our two sons when Bill Clinton was President. We wouldn't do so now, were we young enough to do so.
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:48 PM
2 hrs ago

I don't think we'll ever be grandparents, but we have two cats.

ancianita

(43,378 posts)
11. Understood. Were I young I'd note the international numbers and seriously consider doing the same.
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:29 PM
1 hr ago

But before things felt more hopeless than frustrating, I had four grandchildren; today, two in their last year of medical school in Australia, one ending his second year at the U of Minnesota. Loving them, it follows that I commit to encouraging them toward a better future because they've got helping skills, heart, spirit and fortitude.

randr

(12,657 posts)
7. I have always told right to lifers
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:56 PM
2 hrs ago

Work to make the world a safer place to bring children into. And take care of them when they arrive.

niyad

(134,117 posts)
10. George Carlin's description of pro-forced birthers, oops, right-to-lifers:
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:28 PM
1 hr ago

"If you're pre-birth, you are golden. If you're pre-school, you are fucked."

niyad

(134,117 posts)
9. I was very fortunate to come of age when The Pill was becoming
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:25 PM
1 hr ago

available, when, in some circles at least, motherhood was not automatically assumed and pressured.There was Roe v Wade, Feminism, environmentalism, the anti-war movement, etc. These were good things, because I had a whole host of reasons for not wanting children, including seeing the dysfunction everywhere, being able to see NORAD out my back door as a daily reminder of how fragile the possibility of any kind of future was, and being aware of family genetics. No thank you. I have never regretted my decision. If I wanted to spend time with children, I just borrowed them from my friends, and then returned them. I was the favourite indulgent aunt.

Diamond_Dog

(41,169 posts)
12. It takes two incomes in many cases just to pay for rent, car, living expenses.
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:35 PM
1 hr ago

In the USA most moms don’t have paid leave, ideally both parents should have it.

Moms who don’t get paid leave fall behind in career and pay.

I suppose I’ll take some heat for this one, but men have to step up to the plate and be better partners too.

ancianita

(43,378 posts)
13. I think AI is in the background, being used for jobs humans used to do, men included. Though AI will never surpass human
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:57 PM
1 hr ago

judgment, it's still out there in the background, corporations using it and laying off thousands; Silicon Valley layoffs are in media while other layoffs aren't. But it's happening.

Back in the day I struggled for 18 years to raise a child and live within my means on one income.

These days I'm not so sure it would be different.

Data show that nationally, about 33% of young adults (ages 18–34) still live with their parents, and this figure jumps to nearly 50% for those aged 18–29. Among slightly older young adults (ages 25–34), about 18% reside at home, a figure that reflects a persistent affordability squeeze driven by record-high rent prices and tough housing markets.

When it comes to higher cost of living states, experts emphasize that for many young Americans, moving back home or staying at home is increasingly viewed as a deliberate financial survival and wealth-building strategy rather than a failure to launch. Skill building that won't be taken over by AI is now an ongoing major consideration.

Aristus

(72,564 posts)
14. My grandson decided at the age of twenty-two that he was never going to have kids.
Mon May 25, 2026, 05:41 PM
28 min ago

He got a vasectomy.

A very good decision, if you ask me, because he can barely support himself.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why So Few Babies? We Mig...