trump really wants this slush fund and so the DOJ will NOT acknowledge in writing that this fund is dead. There is litigation pending before a Florida Court and the Virginia court. The issue of whether this was a "fraud on the court" and whether there was a real lawsuit in the first place due to a lack of a "case or controversy" will be litigated.
Trump DOJ thrashes court's demand to officially declare that 'slush fund' is dead #RawStory
— #TuckFrump (@realtuckfrumper.bsky.social) 2026-06-19T19:30:48.000Z
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-doj-2677066353/
President Donald Trump's Department of Justice thrashed a federal judge in a new court filing for demanding that DOJ officials and two Trump cabinet secretaries officially declare that Trump's "anti-weaponization" slush fund is officially dead.
Last month, the Trump administration announced plans to create a $1.776 billion fund to pay claims from people who allege they were wrongfully prosecuted by the federal government. Several of Trump's allies, including formerly convicted members of the Proud Boys, declared that they would seek restitution from the fund, which sparked significant bipartisan pushback.
Political analysts and experts have described the fund as a "slush fund" because the Trump DOJ would have full control over who is eligible for payments, and the legal paperwork establishing the fund states that the federal government bears no responsibility if crimes are committed by people who receive payments.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told the House and Senate judiciary committees that the administration is no longer pursuing the fund, but has refused to put that in writing.
On Friday, the Trump DOJ told a judge in the Eastern District of Virginia that it won't abide by a demand to declare the fund dead. The DOJ argued in the filing that multiple Trump administration officials have said the fund is not moving forward, and those past statements should satisfy the court's demand. It also attached a copy of Blanche's testimony to Congress as evidence of its claims.
"Such declarations are unnecessary, and the compelled testimony of senior officials from the Executive Branch implicates serious separation of powers concerns," the DOJ wrote in its filing.
= new reply since forum marked as read
