Judge declines to block 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' officials say is halted
Source: Politico
06/10/2026 06:03 PM EDT
A federal judge has turned down a bid to formally block the Trump administration from moving forward with a controversial $1.776 billion fund to compensate people claiming to be victims of politically motivated prosecutions and investigations. During a brief hearing in Washington on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon declined to issue a temporary restraining order a watchdog group requested to prevent the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” from being set up and from disbursing payments. A federal judge overseeing a separate lawsuit in Virginia has already temporarily blocked the administration from establishing the fund.
Following a political firestorm over the proposal, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told a House hearing last week that the plan was being abandoned. “We’re not moving forward with the fund, period,” Blanche said. However, Blanche refused to put that commitment in writing. In an interview recorded three days later, President Donald Trump sounded eager to revive the plan. “Me, personally, I think the weaponization fund is a great idea, and so do many other Republicans,” Trump told NBC’s “Meet The Press.” “You have to get it approved. … If they don’t get it approved, I’d be disappointed.”
Leon, a George W. Bush appointee, said he wasn’t convinced Trump’s remarks meant the fund was back on. “He might be doing that … for political benefit to himself,” the judge said. Leon said the lawsuit filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington “appears to be moot” in light of the administration’s recent claims.
The judge said he was entitled to rely on statements in court filings that the fund is not proceeding, and he noted that he has the power to impose sanctions on attorneys who make false statements to the court. He also said he will continue to consider a preliminary injunction request from the group, suggesting he will spring into action if there are more signs that the fund is coming back to life. “I give the Justice Department this warning: Don’t play possum with me,” Leon said.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/10/anti-weaponization-fund-ruling-lawsuit-00957744
= new reply since forum marked as read
Despite insisting that a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund has been scrapped, the administration is quietly assuring allies that payout plans remain on track.
Link to tweet
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/2026/06/trump-anti-weaponization-fund/687500/?gift=j8n6Bjgg-nhjktK6K-3q9oM1S92nQDQ4oKEbivg0Hzs&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
It turns out that it’s not that simple. Behind the scenes, Justice Department and other Trump-administration officials have quietly assured allies that plans for some form of payout remain on track. I spoke with eight people familiar with the so-called Anti-Weaponization Fund—including current and former Justice Department officials, current and former members of Congress, a defense attorney, and political operatives close to the administration. All said that Justice Department officials and people close to the White House have indicated that the payout idea has not actually been scrapped. Rather, they say, officials are exploring whether elements of the fund can be reactivated while also examining alternative arrangements to make sure loyalists get compensated. Across the administration, and even within the Justice Department, officials have differing perspectives on whether the fund itself will ultimately be restored. But either way, officials see a path forward for the government to pay those who say they are victims of supposed government “weaponization.”
A White House official told me in response to a list of emailed questions that “any speculation about potential future actions is just that—speculation. President Trump remains committed to addressing Biden-era weaponization.” A senior DOJ official who was familiar with the department’s plans said there have been no discussions at the highest levels about reviving the fund since Blanche testified, though the official acknowledged DOJ was a large institution and there may have been conversations at lower levels.
Those familiar with the internal conversations—all of whom spoke with me on the condition of anonymity because they feared possible retaliation—told me that the work is being kept quiet while the Trump administration waits for opposition to the fund to blow over. Crucially, the administration is also trying to avoid a fight over the payout plan, which has been deemed a political slush fund by critics, while the Senate considers Blanche’s nomination for attorney general.....
“Right now, you have to be an insider to know who to talk to,” one attorney who had advised multiple individuals seeking compensation told me. One Republican former member of Congress told me that he and others had been assured that the administration’s public statements about the weaponization fund being abandoned were “all part of the plan; nothing has changed.” One Justice Department official and two Republican political advisers told me that public backing for the fund was dropped to clear the way for Blanche’s confirmation, but that they had been promised that payments would eventually be made to January 6 defendants, pardon recipients, and those close to the president. “Trump didn’t want to fight this out in public,” the official told me.....
Blanche may have denied before Congress that the weaponization fund was moving ahead, but others have been less categorical, dropping hints that payouts remain in play. Last week, Stanley Woodward Jr., a former Trump White House official who now serves as associate attorney general and who signed the settlement agreement, appeared to telegraph that the financial-restitution effort was still in progress. He responded “we’re on it” to a post by Senator Lindsey Graham on X that suggested that victims of so-called weaponization during the Biden era could still be compensated through claims under the Federal Torts Claims Act. That law enables individuals to pursue claims in federal court for personal injuries, wrongful death, or property loss caused by the negligent or wrongful acts of federal employees. Woodward later deleted the post.
In multiple interviews over the past week, Trump has declined to confirm that the payout effort has been abandoned. When asked by NBC News if he was “looking for a way to revive it,” Trump did not dispute that: “Well, look. If it was up to me, I’d pay them the kind of money that they deserve,” he said. He added, “I think the weaponization fund is a great idea, and so do many other Republicans.” Although officials say the fund was intended to be available to any victims of government weaponization, regardless of party, the president has focused his comments exclusively on allies who he feels were wrongfully targeted.....
Blanche’s nomination hearing is expected to be scheduled after he submits the required documentation, which includes financial disclosures and an FBI background check. Democrats and Republicans told me it is unclear whether Blanche will be able to win confirmation. Rejection of Blanche, who was Trump’s personal attorney before he returned to office, would mark another setback for a president who is not used to taking no for an answer. Trump has privately told associates that he was drawn to the idea of the Anti-Weaponization Fund because he believes he is “owed” for the “witchhunt” investigations he’s endured, a senior aide and an outside adviser told my colleague Jonathan Lemire. He has raged against the Russia probe that he felt consumed his first term and the criminal investigations he faced while out of office. Now he is seething about acts of defiance from members of his own party on Capitol Hill, including their opposition to the fund. “Republicans wouldn’t have balked,” the outside Trump adviser said, “if his poll numbers were better.” But the historically unpopular president now seems powerless to bring them back into line.
This judge is making a mistake. Luckily the other case in Florida regarding "fraud on the court" is still proceeding.
trump is NOT giving up on this slush fund. trump's feelings were hurt by the various investigations and he wants this slush fund as compensation for his hurt feelings.