J&J vows appeal after US jury hits it with record $1.5 billion talc cancer award
Source: Reuters
December 23, 2025 5:14 AM EST Updated 11 hours ago
Dec 22 (Reuters) - A Baltimore jury ordered Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) and its subsidiaries to pay over $1.5 billion to a woman who claimed decades of exposure to asbestos in the companys talc-based products caused her peritoneal mesothelioma, a form of cancer.
Jurors in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, on Monday found the company, two of its subsidiaries and spinoff Kenvue (KVUE.N) liable for failing to warn plaintiff Cherie Craft that its baby powder contained asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it will appeal the jurys decision, which the plaintiff's law firm said was the largest-ever sum awarded against J&J for a single plaintiff.
The award to Craft, who was diagnosed with mesothelioma in January 2024, includes $59.84 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages of $1 billion against J&J and $500 million against Pecos River Talc - a J&J subsidiary, according to court documents. The case follows a California jury decision earlier in December that awarded $40 million to two women who said the company's baby powder was to blame for their ovarian cancer.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/jj-vows-appeal-after-us-jury-hits-it-with-record-15-billion-talc-cancer-award-2025-12-23/
RECENT RELATED
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143582062
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143543495
pansypoo53219
(22,854 posts)Warpy
(114,363 posts)Asbestos exists naturally in talc. Back when I was a kid, it was considered an acceptable risk, we were surrounded by asbestos in floor tiles, house siding, furnace cement, pipe insulation. It was very useful stuff and the scandal really didn't break until large clusters of rare lung cancers started showing up in workers and their families.
I suppose the reductin in this judgment will come based on whether cases of lung disease can be directily attributed to appropriate use of the baby powder or if the cases are mainly among unprotected workers from miners through packagers.
Multichromatic
(28 posts)I don't care if the 1.5 billion dollar settlement bankrupts Johnson and Johnson. This is a problem they have know about since the 1950's.
They have actively lied about it and tried to cover it up since the 1970's. J&J KNEW it was harmful and would financially hurt their business. They only EVER cared about keeping this all a secret to protect profits.
J&J did what lots of corporation love to do. Commission a phoney favorable "scientific" study to prove how safe their product was. It was all false. A previous 1979 NIOSH study in The Journal of Environmental Pathology and Toxicology found significant increase in respiratory cancer mortality among the talc miners.
A lying criminal corporation doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt and they should not have the settlement reduced. J&J can afford to pay damages for all the people they have hurt and killed over the years from cancer.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer/