Senate proposes alternative to AI moratorium in Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
Source: The Hill
06/05/25 7:12 PM ET
Senate Commerce Committee Republicans are proposing an alternative to a controversial provision in President Trumps tax and spending bill about states regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) after concerns arose from some GOP members.
The Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee unveiled its proposed text for Trumps big, beautiful bill Thursday. The new text altered the House versions language surrounding a potential 10-year ban on state regulation of AI, which received pushback from at least two GOP senators and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.).
The provision in the Senate version requires states to not regulate AI if they want access to federal broadband funding. This differs from the House-passed version, which would establish a blanket 10-year ban on state laws regulating AI models, systems or automated decision systems. This includes enforcement of existing and future laws on the state level.
Proponents of the moratorium argue a patchwork of state laws is confusing or burdensome to technology companies trying to innovate in multiple parts of the country. While the provision sailed through the House Commerce Committee last month, it faced an uphill battle in the Senate.
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5335936-senate-proposes-alternative-to-ai-ban/

returnee
(553 posts)and it will hang us all. Regulate the f**k out of it NOW!!!
A patchwork will be much less dangerous than one or two companies colluding together to control the world. Watching James Bond since the 60's I never thought these villains would become reality.
Karasu
(1,298 posts)bill courtesy of the Byrd Act, but if so, why the fuck are they replacing it with another fucking ridiculous AI policy instead?
This needs to be stripped out in its entirety and the fact that no one is calling for that is beyond insane.