Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(153,947 posts)
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 04:53 AM Yesterday

House GOP 'didn't know' what was in the spending bill when they voted: report

Source: Raw Story

June 5, 2025 5:55PM ET


Multiple Republican members of the House admitted they “didn’t know” part of what was in the House spending bill, according to a NOTUS report.

“Congressman Mike Flood (R-NE) told his constituents at a town hall last week he didn’t know that the bill would limit judges’ power to hold people in contempt for violating court orders, saying he wouldn’t have supported it if he knew,” the outlet said. “When approached by NOTUS about his comments Wednesday, he said to contact his office.

“Congressman Flood 100% supports renewing the Trump tax cuts this year. He’s closely monitoring the Senate’s work and looks forward to continuing to support ‘The One, Big, Beautiful Bill’ as it works its way through the legislative process,” Flood’s spokesperson told NOTUS in a statement. Flood is not alone, major Trump supporter, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) posted on X her disdain for the “ big, beautiful bill.”

“Full transparency,” she said, “I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB [one big beautiful bill] that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights, and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.” Greene later added, “This needs to be stripped out in the Senate.” The second thoughts from House members come as Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, is relentlessly criticizing the bill.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/spending-bill-2672318196/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

no_hypocrisy

(51,787 posts)
1. Maybe future bills should have a cover sheet with bullet points for easy comprehension.
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 05:06 AM
Yesterday

Jon Conyers said it best in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 that House Members don't read the bills they're voting on. (I don't know if he meant fully or partially.) You'd think that meant their staff was supposed to read them and advise accordingly.

And I believe that these bills are purposely drafted in 1,000-plus pages to discourage reading and analysis.

That's how The "PATRIOT" Act got passed so quickly. The meme is "Pass the Sucker because I told you to."

One more thing: in Contracts Law, you are charged with reading the terms of the proposed contract before you sign it. You can't argue in court that you didn't know what you were signing unless you're an Infant, Infirmed, or Incompetent (Incapacitated). So House Members can't get away with ignorance when they vote. They had their chance and f*cked up. Of course, there are those who knew and voted anyway and then claimed ignorance.

BumRushDaShow

(153,947 posts)
2. The other thing though
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 05:30 AM
Yesterday

is that these bills are drafted in at least one or more Committees. So anyone who is a member on one (or several) of the Committees that did the markups, would know some of what was in the bill, but everyone else would have no clue (or could probably care less... per se... if they didn't participate in the markup).

travelingthrulife

(2,493 posts)
13. So the entire bill is not available for review until after the vote?
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 09:14 AM
Yesterday

I have never heard that before. They had discussions in the full house, didn't they?

True Blue American

(18,550 posts)
8. So they are not doing their job. Fire them.
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 07:32 AM
Yesterday

I will not vote for them.
Urging Nike Turner tio fight or switch.

thesquanderer

(12,633 posts)
11. Maybe Tulsi Gabbard can have Fox News put together a cartoon version for them to watch. (n/t)
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:01 AM
Yesterday

Irish_Dem

(70,479 posts)
4. If the bill impacted THEIR income, pension, healthcare, standard of living, they would have read every word.
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 06:22 AM
Yesterday

True Blue American

(18,550 posts)
6. Excuses
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 07:16 AM
Yesterday

Damned excuses. Do your job. Musk wants them all fired, I agree,. Every one,including the ignorant leader.

FakeNoose

(37,585 posts)
10. Of course not - Chump didn't want them to know
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 07:40 AM
Yesterday

He just twisted arms until they voted for the entire thing, without knowing what's in the bill. That's his modus operandi, he did the same thing as Chump 1-point-0.

The GOP House members should be ashamed of themselves. They all need to resign in disgrace.


republianmushroom

(20,144 posts)
14. Bullshit, Republican congresspersons were told to vote for the bill
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 12:14 PM
Yesterday

and they did. Buck up and shut up and take one for the orange god father you ungrateful tax paying voters.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House GOP 'didn't know' w...