Supreme Court allows Trump to terminate teacher training grants as part of anti-DEI policy
Source: NBC News
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to terminate Education Department grants for teacher training that officials deemed to violate their new policy opposing diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.
The 5-4 decision blocks a Massachusetts-based judges ruling that said the administration had failed to follow the correct legal process in terminating the grants. About $65 million in grant payments are outstanding.
The decision is the first win for President Donald Trump at the Supreme Court in his second term.
Five of the court's conservatives were in the majority, while Chief Justice John Roberts joined the three liberals in dissent.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-allows-trump-terminate-teacher-training-grants-rcna198605


newdeal2
(2,194 posts)Dont expect any favors from this court. Roberts has lost control of his monster.
regnaD kciN
(26,896 posts)He was the main force behind the presidential immunity ruling.
MayReasonRule
(2,906 posts)Has brought us to today.
Freedom is "Reason's" child.
When delusion rules our freedoms cease to exist in application.
This is an Americanized Spanish Inquisition Y'all Qaeda Nat-C/Nazi style with SCOTUS as the Grand Inquisitors.
Here's to the rule of law.
Here's to reason's rule!
riversedge
(74,809 posts)NCDem47
(2,670 posts)Fuckers.
Comfortably_Numb
(4,182 posts)The pervert oozes mediocrity yet drives new motor coaches, is a lawn ornament for rich white benefactors on their lavish estates, and is 1/9 of most exclusive club in American government. Fuck off, Clarence.
BumRushDaShow
(150,078 posts)where (per a link in the OP article going to another NBC article) that law was described pretty simply - https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-losing-court-boring-reason-adminitrative-procedure-act-rcna191113
Known in abbreviated form as the APA, the law allows judges to throw out federal agency actions that are "arbitrary and capricious" on various grounds, including failing to articulate why the agencies are changing policy.
(snip)
Obviously there was a draconian "policy change" that was "articulated", as vile as it was.
I would think they could potentially try again using the Impoundment Control Act as an argument (assuming there were line items in the appropriations for the Education Department, et al, that designated what the funds were supposed to be for).
bluestarone
(19,360 posts)That's just peachy. Maybe the congress needs to do the same, so the MAGA'S don't know who voted for what?