Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(150,990 posts)
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 08:48 AM Mar 21

California Appeals Court Upholds Ban on Higher-Capacity Magazines, Spurring Unusual Video Dissent

Source: US News and World Report/AP

March 20, 2025, at 8:59 p.m.


LOS ANGELES (AP) — An appeals court ruled Thursday that California’s law banning gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition can remain in place, a decision that prompted one judge to record an unusual video dissent that shows him loading guns in his chambers.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 7-4 that the law was permissible under the Second Amendment because large-capacity magazines are not considered “arms” or “protected accessories." Even if they were, California's ban ”falls within the Nation’s tradition of protecting innocent persons by prohibiting especially dangerous uses of weapons and by regulating components necessary to the firing of a firearm," the opinion stated.

Judge Lawrence VanDyke disagreed, and included a link to a video of himself posted on YouTube in his dissent. “This is the first video like this that I've ever made,” VanDyke said. “I share this because a rudimentary understanding of how guns are made, sold, used, and commonly modified makes obvious why California's proposed test and the one my colleagues are adopting today simply does not work.”

In the video, VanDyke handles several guns in his chambers and demonstrates how they are loaded and fired. He also shows high-capacity magazines and argues that they are no different from other gun accessories that could be added to a firearm to make it more dangerous. Under the majority's logic, he said, that would allow the government to pick and choose any of them to be banned. Judge Marsha S. Berzon criticized VanDyke's video in a separate opinion, saying he was including “facts outside the record” and was, in essence, appointing himself an expert witness in the case.

Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2025-03-20/california-appeals-court-upholds-ban-on-higher-capacity-magazines-spurring-unusual-video-dissent

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Appeals Court Upholds Ban on Higher-Capacity Magazines, Spurring Unusual Video Dissent (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 21 OP
Perhaps Judge VanDyke can explain "well regulated militia" also groundloop Mar 21 #1
Me Thinks wyn borkins Mar 21 #2
....ask the gun humpers living here this question.... HotRod Deluxe Mar 21 #3

wyn borkins

(1,230 posts)
2. Me Thinks
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 09:42 AM
Mar 21

The judge selected her words most-judiciously, when she offered: Judge Marsha S. Berzon criticized VanDyke's video in a separate opinion, saying he was including “facts outside the record” and was, in essence, appointing himself an expert witness in the case. (my emphasis).

HotRod Deluxe

(95 posts)
3. ....ask the gun humpers living here this question....
Fri Mar 21, 2025, 11:13 AM
Mar 21

What do you suppose is the procedure for applying for a firearm permit in countries like Russia, or North Korea, or Venezuela, or.....
I'm guessing those governments will give you a firearm for free, ....... if you join the military. But don't expect to take it home with you after your shift is over.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California Appeals Court ...