DOJ refuses to answer some questions from the judge who blocked Alien Enemies Act deportations
Source: NBC News
Trump administration
DOJ refuses to answer some questions from the judge who blocked Alien Enemies Act deportations
The Government maintains that there is no justification to order the provision of additional information," the Justice Department said in a court filing.
March 18, 2025, 12:45 PM EDT
By Gary Grumbach, Chloe Atkins and Dareh Gregorian
The Justice Department on Tuesday refused to answer a number of questions from a federal judge who had demanded more information on deportations that were carried out under a rarely used wartime act. ... "The Government maintains that there is no justification to order the provision of additional information, and that doing so would be inappropriate," the Justice Department said in a court filing responding to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg's ruling that it provide him with more information.
The filing, however, did include a declaration from an official with Immigration and Customs Enforcement answering some of the questions the judge had posed at a hearing Monday, at which he expressed frustration that the government had appeared to snub his order halting the deportations and its refusal to answer questions about its actions. ... The judge had summarized the government's position as "we dont care, well do what we want.
In a verbal order on Saturday, Boasberg had directed any planes in the air carrying deportees to return to the U.S. after he issued a restraining order blocking deportations stemming from President Donald Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport suspected members of a Venezuelan gang. It was later revealed that the planes had arrived in El Salvador, raising questions about the timing of the flights and custody handover.
In his declaration, Robert Cerna, an acting field director of enforcement and removal operations for ICE, said that "three planes carrying aliens departed the United States for El Salvador International Airport" after Trump had issued his proclamation. ... "Two of those planes departed U.S. territory and airspace before 7:25 PM EDT," Cerna said, referencing the time the judge's written ruling was entered on the court docket. "The third plane departed after that time, but all individuals on that third plane had Title 8 final removal orders and thus were not removed solely on the basis of the Proclamation at issue," he added.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-refuses-respond-questions-judge-blocked-alien-enemies-act-deportat-rcna196883
Another thread, in GD:
Raw Story: 'There is no justification': Pam Bondi defies Judge Boasberg's demand for deportation info
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220151788

surfered
(6,255 posts)NotHardly
(2,067 posts)JohnSJ
(98,430 posts)SSJVegeta
(374 posts)How would enforcing a contempt charge against the government work, exactly? Has it ever been done?
This is all very very bad...
Polybius
(19,782 posts)She would have to indict herself.
SSJVegeta
(374 posts)moonshinegnomie
(3,308 posts)SSJVegeta
(374 posts)I'm guessing. Do courts have any law enforcement officers under their authority still?
mahatmakanejeeves
(64,360 posts)Supreme Court chief justice rebukes Trump over call to impeach judge in deportation case
Published Tue, Mar 18 202510:28 AM EDT | Updated 3 Min Ago
Dan Mangan
@_DanMangan
Kevin Breuninger
@KevinWilliamB
{snip}
On Tuesday, a top U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement official in a declaration filed in Boasbergs court revealed that one of three planes carrying alleged gang members departed the United States for El Salvador on Saturday night, after Boasberg had issued an order barring their deportation.
But all individuals on that third plane had Title 8 final removal orders and thus were not removed solely on the basis of the Proclamation at issue in the lawsuit, the declaration said. ... To avoid any doubt, no one on any flight departing the United States after 7:25 PM EDT on March 15, 2025, was removed solely on the basis of the Proclamation at issue.
The filing also said that about 54 alleged members of the Venezuelan gang are currently in detention, about 172 alleged members are on the non-detained docket and about 32 are in criminal custody with active detainers against them. ... Should they be transferred to ICE custody, they will likely be placed in removal proceeding, the filing said.
{snip}
moniss
(7,068 posts)not to be a lapdog. Until the case gets to him and then he shows everybody he is a lapdog.
SupportSanity
(1,376 posts)I hope this "storm" goes the right way.
It has LOTS of potential.
Staying tuned.
Bayard
(24,763 posts)Do not pass go. Do not collect $100.
republianmushroom
(19,500 posts)Where are the DUrs that defended the DOJ for years ? CRICKETS