Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

James48

(4,804 posts)
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:00 PM Mar 12

OPM chief rejects court order to testify on probationary firings as case expands governmentwide

Source: GovExec.com

(OPM guy says he won’t testify in court, disobeying judge)

Washington DC.- A federal judge has ordered the acting head of the Office of Personnel Management to testify at a court hearing examining the legality of the Trump administration’s mass firings of federal employees, but the key workforce official has informed the court he will ignore the order.

Acting OPM Director Charles Ezell was slated to appear in a U.S. District Court in San Francisco on Thursday after Judge William Alsup ruled Monday on Monday that he must do so, but he will now face a to-be-determined sanction. The Trump administration had sought to block his testimony, saying it would raise constitutional concerns, but the judge rejected the argument. Ezell has already submitted written testimony, Alsup said, and now must be subject to cross examination.

After initial publication of this story, the Trump administration Tuesday evening informed the court Ezell would not testify and withdrew his written declaration suggesting he did not order the probationary firings across government. It called live testimony "not necessary" for Ezell or any other official. The plaintiffs in the case are seeking testimony from human resources personnel throughout government.

Alsup has already issued a preliminary ruling in favor of the American Federation of Government Employees and other groups that brought the lawsuit, finding OPM illegally ordered the firings of employees in their probationary periods—mostly those hired in the last one or two years—and demanding the agency rescind those directives. Only a handful of agencies were impacted by the temporary restraining order and implementation has varied. The Defense Department was a named defendant in the case but has continued to fire employees, while other named agencies have not yet recalled any staff.

The judge this week has also allowed AFGE to amend its complaint to significantly expand the breadth of the case. It now includes all cabinet departments and eight large agencies, leaving the door open to sweeping judicial action that could impact vast swaths of the federal government. Roughly 30,000 employees have been fired to date.





Read more: https://www.govexec.com/workforce/2025/03/opm-chief-compelled-testify-probationary-firings-case-expands-governmentwide/403663/?oref=ge-featured-river-secondary



If they won’t obey a judges order, can’t we just arrest them ourselves?
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Walleye

(39,631 posts)
1. I didn't know that the ability to reject a court order was even a thing. Seems like it just started.
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:02 PM
Mar 12

If this judge has any respect for himself, he’ll hold the guy in contempt. Remember Peter Navarro.

Irish_Dem

(68,199 posts)
2. What would happen to you or me if we refused to follow a court order.
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:05 PM
Mar 12

And basically told the judge to go f himself.

TheRickles

(2,683 posts)
3. Hold him in contempt, and then what? These guys are now untouchable, as the DOJ won't pursue anything.
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:05 PM
Mar 12

returnee

(509 posts)
4. With Navarro we had a ...a properly functioning DOJ. n/y
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:09 PM
Mar 12

We’ll need US marshals to bring him in.

ScratchCat

(2,654 posts)
5. We are basically at impeachment and removal time
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:20 PM
Mar 12

"The Whitehouse" or "The Trump Administration" can't tell someone to ignore a judges order. This is coming from Trump himself. Its a high crime to tell someone to ignore a court order. There is nowhere in the Constitution giving the Executive Branch the power to ignore the Judicial Branch. He must be removed. The longer Democrats wait to insist, the worse this is going to get.

FWIW, US Marshalls can't ignore a judges order to detain and bring someone in. They will be held in contempt and jailed just like Ezell will if they tried, which they will not.

Again, its time for him to go.

republianmushroom

(19,488 posts)
6. "IF", acting OPM Director Charles Ezell, doesn't show, arrest him and jail time.
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 03:29 PM
Mar 12

"IF", the judge doesn't do that, then just shut down the judicial system because it is all Bull Shit with no respect.

PSPS

(14,470 posts)
7. LOL. Here we go again. "will now face a to-be-determined sanction"
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 05:07 PM
Mar 12

Strongly-worded letter? Expressing frustration? Write a groveling letter to the king begging for accommodation?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»OPM chief rejects court o...