Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(150,876 posts)
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 08:11 AM Mar 12

Groups working with USAID say the government still has not paid what it owes for their work

Source: Scripps News

Posted 9:31 PM, Mar 11, 2025 and last updated 9:33 PM, Mar 11, 2025


On a Thursday evening in Washington, D.C. more than a dozen lawyers sat inside a courtroom at the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Court House for hearing in front of Judge Amir H. Ali. After a four-hour long proceeding, judge Ali issued a directive. The federal government had four days to pay plaintiff organizations that had sued the federal government for money they say they were owned. Organizations say they were owed a combined $2 billion for work that had already been completed.

The story began when the Trump administration announced an executive order with the intended goal of dismantling the United States Agency for International Aid, or USAID, an organization that focuses on humanitarian aid around the globe. The administration expressed concerns about how U.S. dollars were being spent abroad. The administration said it reserved the right to review, then cut-off spending in cases it deems fit.

But several organizations that worked directly with USAID sued. They argued in court that the abrupt closure of programs and cut in funding caused irreparable harm to workers and vulnerable people who relied on their services. The organizations also petitioned a court to force the federal government to pay those organizations for work they’d already completed, but did not receive payments for.

On that Thursday evening inside the federal courthouse, the petitioners got their wish, and Judge Ali gave the federal government an order: All payments for work that organizations completed prior to February 13, 2025, must be paid by March 10, 2025 at 6 p.m. But the deadline has come and gone, and while some organizations have received sizable payments from the federal government, Scripps News has learned other organizations have received little or no money at all.

Read more: https://www.scrippsnews.com/politics/president-trumps-first-100-days/groups-working-with-usaid-say-the-government-still-has-not-paid-what-it-owes-for-their-work

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Groups working with USAID say the government still has not paid what it owes for their work (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 12 OP
Turnip has NEVER believed in paying his bills. Why would anyone expect him to change now ? eppur_se_muova Mar 12 #1
LOL....Trump still fucking over farmers that voted for him three times Bengus81 Mar 12 #2
Is the Judge brave enough to hold them in contempt, or another coward? NotHardly Mar 12 #3
Beyond anything else that appears to be a constitutional crisis, slightlv Mar 12 #4
So SOME of the orgs have been paid... RussBLib Mar 12 #5

eppur_se_muova

(38,870 posts)
1. Turnip has NEVER believed in paying his bills. Why would anyone expect him to change now ?
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 09:39 AM
Mar 12

He's always been a deadbeat. Now he's a deadbeat pResident, making the US the biggest deadbeat country in the world.

Bengus81

(8,693 posts)
2. LOL....Trump still fucking over farmers that voted for him three times
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 11:23 AM
Mar 12

I'd like to feel sorry for them but.............

slightlv

(5,393 posts)
4. Beyond anything else that appears to be a constitutional crisis,
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 02:19 PM
Mar 12

this IS a constitutional crisis. The Executive office is the one to enforce the paying of monies deemed necessary by the Congress. If the office tasked with paying the money won't pay the money, what do you do to enforce it if you're the judiciary branch? Brand them with contempt. Meaning what? The government has to pay a fine (which comes out of OUR money... not theirs), throw someone in jail... who?

The constitution doesn't have a provision which declares what a judge can actually do to MAKE the government do as it is suppose to do, but rather turns its back while giving you the finger. The founding fathers assumed being elected would be an elite enough office that no no-goodnik would get in and trash it. Funny how those "assumptions" work...

RussBLib

(9,862 posts)
5. So SOME of the orgs have been paid...
Wed Mar 12, 2025, 03:16 PM
Mar 12

...but SOME have not. Somewhat misleading headline.

Still should be unacceptable to the judge, but what can he do?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Groups working with USAID...