Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(150,876 posts)
Tue Mar 11, 2025, 06:10 PM Mar 11

Judge orders Trump DOJ to produce OPM head for testimony in mass firings case or face his wrath as legal showdown looms

Source: Law & Crime

Mar 11th, 2025, 12:39 pm


A federal judge in California has ordered the Trump administration to produce Charles Ezell, the acting director of the Office of Personnel and Management, for testimony in the ongoing OPM mass firings case, just days after the Justice Department allegedly claimed Ezell wouldn’t be made available to testify — or face his wrath in court.

“If Ezell does not appear in violation of that order, then the Court will have to decide the sanction, including whether or not to strike or limit his sworn declaration,” warned U.S. District Judge William Alsup in a Monday order.

Ezell, appointed by Trump to be acting director after he took office in January, is accused of unlawfully firing thousands of government workers still in the probationary period of their employment. The judge had previously ordered Ezell to appear in court on Thursday to testify, but the plaintiffs suing the OPM — five labor unions and five nonprofit organizations — said in court filings last week that they believed DOJ’s Civil Division was not going to let Ezell take the stand. On Monday, those fears came to fruition as DOJ lawyers filed a motion to vacate the upcoming evidentiary hearing and preclude Ezell’s testimony.

Alsup said in his ruling that he sided against the request to have Ezell skate testimony because he had already submitted a sworn declaration supporting the defendants’ position. The government argued in its motion that “the March 13 evidentiary hearing and any depositions are unnecessary in light of OPM’s compliance with the TRO and [their] willingness to convert the Court’s TRO into a preliminary injunction.” But Alsup, a Bill Clinton appointee, pointed out how things have changed since he first granted a temporary restraining order (TRO) last month halting any additional firings.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/court-will-have-to-decide-the-sanction-judge-orders-trump-doj-to-produce-opm-head-for-testimony-in-mass-firings-case-or-face-his-wrath-as-legal-showdown-looms/



Full headline: ‘Court will have to decide the sanction’: Judge orders Trump DOJ to produce OPM head for testimony in mass firings case or face his wrath as legal showdown looms

Link to ORDER (PDF viewer) - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25557305-charles-ezelljudge-order/

Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/25557305/charles-ezelljudge-order.pdf
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders Trump DOJ to produce OPM head for testimony in mass firings case or face his wrath as legal showdown looms (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 11 OP
tRump thinks OPM stands for Other People's Money, something tRump excels at using. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 11 #1
They are telling him not to appear...........oh okay..........let me see if I were to do that how fast I would be held turbinetree Mar 11 #2
Going to be interesting republianmushroom Mar 11 #3
notice how NJCher Mar 11 #4
Yep. ancianita Mar 11 #5

turbinetree

(26,028 posts)
2. They are telling him not to appear...........oh okay..........let me see if I were to do that how fast I would be held
Tue Mar 11, 2025, 06:55 PM
Mar 11

in contempt...............

NJCher

(39,753 posts)
4. notice how
Tue Mar 11, 2025, 07:50 PM
Mar 11

this post, which has some excellent news in it, has only a few posts?

The posts that get the most action around here are ones where people can react in fear. A post that shows somebody in the justice system has some guts? I guess no one is interested in that.

ancianita

(40,290 posts)
5. Yep.
Tue Mar 11, 2025, 08:50 PM
Mar 11

News about the trainwreck gets knee-jerk anger, which can become an addictive emotional habit.

Good news gets little response. OTOH, maybe it's because many think that's the way good government is supposed to work.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge orders Trump DOJ to...