Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(81,612 posts)
Sun May 24, 2026, 10:18 AM Yesterday

Trump "... started a war without a plan, wasted billions of dollars in equipment, failed to prepare obvious targets



May 23
I don’t often agree with Kagan but he seems to be right that this is what Trump is hoping for.

He started a war without a plan, wasted billions of dollars in equipment, failed to prepare obvious targets for defense, which resulted in unnecessary deaths of American soldiers, hollowed out the Pentagon’s ability to assess targets, which resulted in us murdering over 150 civilians, mostly girls, when we bombed their elementary school in Minab, handed Iran incredible strategic victory by allowing them to take de facto control of the Strait of Hormuz and show that we are powerless to stop it, exposed the strategic isolation of the U.S. that his antagonism to our allies has brought us in, and now he’s trying to slink away with some cockamamie cover that he’s going to use to claim victory.

The Iran hawks are clamoring for him to “finish the job” but he’s already finished, and Iran knows it. He doesn’t have a mandate to send ground troops, and even he he orders more bombing, it will be a cosmetic tactic designed to disguise the defeat. What can you possibly accomplish by trying the exact same thing after it failed the first time except now you have depleted a lot of the ammo and Congress has gotten more assertive about not expanding the war?

?s=20
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump "... started a war without a plan, wasted billions of dollars in equipment, failed to prepare obvious targets (Original Post) riversedge Yesterday OP
this man bankrupted many companies - who's only capable of stealing from what's already there samsingh Yesterday #1
Trump fired all the experts and appointed toadies and yes-men. They all supported his cockamamie "plan" to Martin68 Yesterday #7
Mostly Correct ProfessorGAC Yesterday #14
Perhaps you missed the quotation marks I put around the word "plan," indicating it was not truly a plan at all. Martin68 Yesterday #16
Either Way... ProfessorGAC Yesterday #17
The original article, from Atlantic: Ocelot II Yesterday #2
Well worth the read. Amaryllis Yesterday #10
Companies that make missiles love this plan IronLionZion Yesterday #3
And they're also going to need new drones... Justice matters. Yesterday #8
It may be easier to have Treasury hand them suitcases full of cash IronLionZion Yesterday #15
Loser.....Again BeneteauBum Yesterday #4
I am wondering whether it is a failure or intentional. wnylib Yesterday #9
I've considered the same. BeneteauBum Yesterday #13
Trump "Fails" Upwards, Always. FOLLOW THE MONEY. ColoringFool Yesterday #5
Total U.S. surrender. Donny, "you will get so sick of winning all the time that you will beg me to stop winning. Botany Yesterday #6
We need to consider the plight of the Iranian people gulliver Yesterday #11
Stopped talking about the Epstein files for a minute though. n/t flvegan Yesterday #12
trump had no strategy or plan LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #18
And it was all just to pad Fox News slop content. Initech Yesterday #19
Pretty good assessment. GoodRaisin Yesterday #20

samsingh

(18,476 posts)
1. this man bankrupted many companies - who's only capable of stealing from what's already there
Sun May 24, 2026, 10:30 AM
Yesterday

that's his plan

nothing constructive

Martin68

(28,091 posts)
7. Trump fired all the experts and appointed toadies and yes-men. They all supported his cockamamie "plan" to
Sun May 24, 2026, 12:50 PM
Yesterday

bomb Iraq without a second (or even a first) thought. He perfectly engineered his own (and our country's) defeat.

ProfessorGAC

(77,332 posts)
14. Mostly Correct
Sun May 24, 2026, 01:53 PM
Yesterday

I take issue with it being HIS plan.
There is no evidence he has ever planned anything.
It's somebody's stupid plan, but I highly doubt he was capable of even this screwed up idea.

Martin68

(28,091 posts)
16. Perhaps you missed the quotation marks I put around the word "plan," indicating it was not truly a plan at all.
Sun May 24, 2026, 03:01 PM
Yesterday

ProfessorGAC

(77,332 posts)
17. Either Way...
Sun May 24, 2026, 03:48 PM
Yesterday

...it was not him.
We agree that there was no real plan. But, whatever they had that badly passed for a plan wasn't formulated by The Failure.

IronLionZion

(51,582 posts)
3. Companies that make missiles love this plan
Sun May 24, 2026, 12:30 PM
Yesterday

because that used up ammo needs to be replenished. US has to buy more missiles. Countries all over the Middle East are going to need more interceptor missiles.

Justice matters.

(10,097 posts)
8. And they're also going to need new drones...
Sun May 24, 2026, 01:01 PM
Yesterday

To make dumb and dumber richer.

And dump wants the IRS to never audit them for years.

That's a "win" (for them) if Republicrooks in Congress fall in line to show their cowardice.

IronLionZion

(51,582 posts)
15. It may be easier to have Treasury hand them suitcases full of cash
Sun May 24, 2026, 02:43 PM
Yesterday

instead of killing so many people and wrecking global supply chains.

wnylib

(26,507 posts)
9. I am wondering whether it is a failure or intentional.
Sun May 24, 2026, 01:07 PM
Yesterday

Putin has his eye on Europe. As a result of Hormuz being closed, oil is scarcer and more expensive for Europe. But Putin still has access to oil.

BeneteauBum

(799 posts)
13. I've considered the same.
Sun May 24, 2026, 01:51 PM
Yesterday

However this pays out, most Americans are pissed at the waste and fraud.

Peace ☮️

gulliver

(14,097 posts)
11. We need to consider the plight of the Iranian people
Sun May 24, 2026, 01:37 PM
Yesterday

Iranians judge. They and they alone have the final say about whether the unintentional collateral loss of innocent life (roughly 150 schoolkids) in their country was a necessary price for their chance at freedom from tyranny.

Remember, there was a brutish, sadistic, intentional murder of tens of thousands of liberal and progressive Iranian protesters (our true friends and allies as Democrats). Those innocent liberal and progressive victims are justly and accurately called "murder" victims.

They were murdered by far right, theocratic, homophobic, patriarchal, crony oligarchic bigots, the Iranian Islamic Republic regime. It can't be seen clearly and justly in any other way, imo. It's cut and dried.

The Islamic Republic regime dwarfs anything or anyone else in rottenness and (a term I use sparingly) evil. There is no moral or even vaguely respectable position that fails to want the Iranian Islamic Republic regime to lose. (That's an unnecessary reminder to folks with a functioning conscience like present company in this board and in the Democratic Party.)

Do I like that Trump destroyed the Iran nuclear agreement we achieved under Obama? Of course not. But we are where we are, and we need to win if possible. I think no true Dem, completely informed, wants anything else. The Iranian Islamic Republic regime can never have a nuclear weapon. I don't think any of us will be happy or safe if Trump fails to ensure that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump "... started a war ...