General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Roberts: Wahh! Wahh! You People Don't Understand Us!
Roberts complained at a conference of lawyers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, according to the report.
By Susie Madrak May 7, 2026
John Roberts is having a little hissy fit over how Americans view the court as "truly political actors." He also added that the court takes great effort to "figure out what the Constitution means," even though he acknowledged that some of the court's decisions are "unpopular.
Roberts made the comments at a conference of lawyers in Hershey, Pennsylvania, according to the report.
I think at a very basic level, people think were making policy decisions, [that] were saying we think this is what things should be as opposed to this is what the law provides, Roberts said. I think they view us as truly political actors, which I dont think is an accurate understanding of what we do. I would say thats the main difficulty.
https://crooksandliars.com/2026/05/john-roberts-wahh-wahh-you-people-dont
Hey John Roberts your a fucking liar...........right along with your 5 other maga minions..........
Susan Madrak says it perfectly.............
-snip-
Oh, puh-LEEZE. It's bad enough that you've turned the Court into a policy arm of the Republican party, but you get to piss on our legs and tell us it's raining?
Tick-tock, you slimy weasel. Reform is coming
Irish_Dem
(82,122 posts)They belong in prison.
milestogo
(23,174 posts)will be as head of the Court that destroyed democracy. He will be remembered for centuries.
Fuck you very much, John Roberts.
irisblue
(37,769 posts)Spazito
(55,973 posts)usonian
(26,366 posts)
kerry-is-my-prez
(10,324 posts)usonian
(26,366 posts)Old Maid? Is that too tough for him?
Bridge?

bdamomma
(69,614 posts)court and term limits please must be enacted!!!!!!
walkingman
(11,101 posts)The key steps would be:
1. A bill passes the House of Representatives
2. A bill passes the Senate
This means overcoming or eliminating the Senate filibuster unless one party has 60 votes
3. The president signs the bill
4. The president nominates new justices to the added seats
5. The Senate confirms them
With present day voter suppression and the likely voter apathy caused by knowing that your vote does not count the task becomes even harder.
Can we call ourselves a Democracy?
Johonny
(26,506 posts)Justices second. As party politics has basically taken over all of our lives... it simply cannot be unseen.
Thats his problem. He is a Republican first, and American second. We all see it.
chelsea0011
(10,242 posts)is no misunderstanding.
oasis
(53,882 posts)republianmushroom
(22,607 posts)sarchasm
(1,316 posts)evilhime
(379 posts)The Roberts court will go down as the most corrupt biased unAmerican court in our history - They are literally destroying everything that was accomplished in the last century, and honestly my pitbull could interpret the Constitution better than they do. Im a 60s child and all the freedoms we fought for back then are being destroyed and we are having to start all over again. You know the Greenwood (Trump) anthem God Bless the USA? There is a line in there I think would be better saying where at least I used to feel free.
themaguffin
(5,347 posts)BaronChocula
(4,698 posts)in a visit to the Tröegs Brewery.
RANDYWILDMAN
(3,176 posts)Money equals speech is something he really agrees with...sad
Volaris
(11,787 posts)and you're just being a whiny bitch about having been clocked.
ananda
(35,427 posts)Including Roberts.
11 Bravo
(24,333 posts)struggle4progress
(126,605 posts)turbinetree
(27,719 posts)along with help from that "judge" in Florida...........
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,598 posts)Justices should consider not only why most believe the high court is motivated by politics, but also their own role in fueling the problem they find offensive.
Why John Robertsâ defense of the Supreme Court was so wildly unpersuasive www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
— Philly Joe (@joehick58.bsky.social) 2026-05-07T22:39:16.924Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/john-roberts-defense-supreme-court-unpersuasive
I think, at a very basic level, people think were making policy decisions, were saying we think this is how things should be, as opposed to what the law provides, he said. I think they view us as purely political actors, which I dont think is an accurate understanding of what we do.
His remarks to a conference of judges and lawyers from the 3rd U.S. Circuit in Pennsylvania came at a time of low public confidence in the court, and about a week after the court handed down a decision that hollowed out the Voting Rights Act.
As part of the same remarks, Roberts went on to argue that sitting justices are not part of the political process and Im not sure people grasp that as much as is appropriate......
Why does the public see the justices, as Roberts put it, as political actors? It might have something to do with far-right justices issuing regressive and reactionary rulings. And far-right justices getting caught up in indefensible ethics controversies. And far-right justices elevating the presidency above the law.
But I suspect one of the main reasons so many people see justices as political actors is the frequency with which they act like political actors. Right around the same time that the public was learning about Roberts remarks, Justice Neil Gorsuch, who has a track record of chatting with conservative media personalities, appeared on a conservative podcast, talking about his belief that young conservatives must have courage to stand by their beliefs.....
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut argued five years ago, Judges turning into political actors, giving speeches attacking journalists, is terrible for the court and terrible for democracy. Justices proceeded to ignore the warning.
The tarnishing of the Supreme Court its credibility, its integrity and its reputation has unfolded episodically over the course of several years. If Roberts and his brethren want to whine about public reactions to their work, thats their right, but if they want to help restore the institutions standing, they have an enormous amount of work to do. To date, they have shown no willingness whatsoever to even acknowledge the causes of the Supreme Courts problems, much less take steps to address what ails it.
Roberts is a racist asshole who has been plotting to overturn or gut the Voting Rights Act since Roberts' days in the Reagan DOJ. I still remember reading the Shelby County opinion and dissent where Roberts gutted Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That was NOT a legal opinion but a policy decision based on Roberts' belief that there was no longer racial prejudice. Alito's opinion is merely a continuation of the racist policies of the six asshole SCOTUS justices.
turbinetree
(27,719 posts)Scrivener7
(60,023 posts)Deuxcents
(27,552 posts)You closed the door on what was left of the Voting Rights Act and opened the flood gates to drown out any minority voices for representation. We all heard you loud and clear
RockRaven
(19,694 posts)He can be a liar, or he can be delusional, but he cannot be neither.