Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(24,082 posts)
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:42 AM Yesterday

John Roberts explains that the reason you're pissed at the SCOTUS is that you suck, and you're f*cking stupid.

Pushing back at the suggestion that he and his colleagues are “purely political actors,” he said, “We’re not simply part of the political process, and there’s a reason for that, and

I’m not sure people grasp that as much as is appropriate.”


Roberts, who was nominated to the Supreme Court by George W. Bush in 2005, pointed out that a line is crossed when critics’ attacks become personal. “There is a point where it changes from criticism of the opinion to criticism of the judge, and it can lead to some very serious problems. As soon as you personalize, it can become problematic.”

“There’s a lot of hostility that’s publicized about judicial decisions and which judge wrote those decisions,” he said. “I think we have to be a little more careful and make sure people, to the extent you can, are more careful about that.”

The chief justice added, “I think considered criticism is a very good thing. You hope it’s intelligent criticism, but it doesn’t have to be. It’s a free country, and I certainly don’t object to it, and I don’t think my colleagues do either.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/conservative-scotus-justice-john-roberts-begs-furious-critics-to-stop-being-mean/
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Roberts explains that the reason you're pissed at the SCOTUS is that you suck, and you're f*cking stupid. (Original Post) Miles Archer Yesterday OP
John Roberts is a corrupt turd of the first stank. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #1
I will never forget the stupid, lost look in the displacedvermoter Yesterday #5
5-4 Rehnquist, now 6-3 Roberts Kid Berwyn Yesterday #7
The Federalist Society has been grooming these bastards for a generation now, since law school displacedvermoter Yesterday #9
Fuck yourself Creep Justice Roberts UpInArms Yesterday #2
6 assholes in the US SC..................... Lovie777 Yesterday #3
Term limits choie Yesterday #4
Sorry John, we're not buying it. Omnipresent Yesterday #6
Is this whitesplaining in a black robe... ananda Yesterday #8
Well, when opinion after opinion is Bettie Yesterday #10

Kid Berwyn

(24,941 posts)
1. John Roberts is a corrupt turd of the first stank.
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:47 AM
Yesterday

“They come to me.” — Jane Roberts, wife of Chief Justice John Roberts.



’They come to me’: Jane Roberts’ legal recruiting work involved officials whose agencies had cases before the Supreme Court

In newly revealed testimony, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts said she worked for “U.S. attorneys, cabinet officials, former senators” and more.


By HAILEY FUCHS and JOSH GERSTEIN
Politico, 01/31/2023

Jane Roberts, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts, acknowledges having represented a wide variety of public officials — including senior Justice Department officials and Cabinet members — as they transitioned to jobs in the private sector, according to testimony in an arbitration hearing to resolve a lawsuit filed by an ex-colleague against her former legal recruiting business.

A partial transcript of that testimony was included in a complaint submitted to the House, Senate and Justice Department filed in December on behalf of the former colleague.

Snip…

Jane Roberts’ placements included at least one firm with a prominent Supreme Court practice, according to the complaint, which also includes sworn testimony from Roberts herself, in which she notes the powerful officials — whose agencies have had frequent cases before her husband — for whom she has worked.

“A significant portion of my practice on the partner side is with senior government lawyers, ranging from U.S. attorneys, cabinet officials, former senators, chairmen of federal commissions, general counsel of federal commissions, and then senior political appointees within the ranks of various agencies, and I -- they come to me looking to transition to the private sector,” Roberts said, according to a transcript of a 2015 arbitration hearing related to her former colleague’s termination.

In her testimony, Roberts also noted the benefit of working with senior government officials: “Successful people have successful friends.”

Continues…

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/31/jane-roberts-legal-recruiting-work-agencies-cases-supreme-court-00080515

“Just Us.”

displacedvermoter

(4,921 posts)
5. I will never forget the stupid, lost look in the
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:59 AM
Yesterday

eyes of a colleague, oh so many years ago, who told me that he was voting for Nader "because there is no difference between Bush and Gore".

I guess he was right because I just know that Gore, too, would also have appointed Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court, right?

Dumbass...

Kid Berwyn

(24,941 posts)
7. 5-4 Rehnquist, now 6-3 Roberts
Thu May 7, 2026, 09:21 AM
Yesterday

White Power Affirmative Action Specialists.



How John Roberts Got to the Top

The Spectre of White Affirmative Action


By LINN WASHINGTON, Jr.
September 28, 2005, CounterPunch

EXCERPT...

Bush's selection of John Roberts for Chief Justice is a glaring example of white affirmative-action irrespective of Roberts' respected legal acumen elevating him above the ranks of an inadequately prepared candidate.

The bigot Bush designated Roberts to replace, the late William Rehnquist, at least spent fourteen years as a Supreme Court Justice before his elevation to Chief Justice.

Roberts has less than three years experience as a federal appeals court judge, getting that lofty position without having any prior judicial experience.

SNIP...

Roberts landed a plum clerkship with a federal appeals judge after his Harvard Law School graduation, followed immediately by a prestige elevating clerkship with US Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist ­ who never hired a black law clerk.

CONTINUED...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2005/09/28/the-spectre-of-white-affirmative-action/

A 20 Year-old article that is still news to most everybody in the United States of America. Then there’s the 26-year-old article with the backstory about Ass. Justice William “Eagle Eye” Rehnquist, for whom John Roberts clerked…



Just Our Bill

By Dennis Roddy
Saturday, December 02, 2000

Lito Pena is sure of his memory. Thirty-six years ago he, then a Democratic Party poll watcher, got into a shoving match with a Republican who had spent the opening hours of the 1964 election doing his damnedest to keep people from voting in south Phoenix.

"He was holding up minority voters because he knew they were going to vote Democratic," said Pena.

The guy called himself Bill. He knew the law and applied it with the precision of a swordsman. He sat at the table at the Bethune School, a polling place brimming with black citizens, and quizzed voters ad nauseam about where they were from, how long they'd lived there -- every question in the book. A passage of the Constitution was read and people who spoke broken English were ordered to interpret it to prove they had the language skills to vote.

By the time Pena arrived at Bethune, he said, the line to vote was four abreast and a block long. People were giving up and going home.

SNIP…

Party leaders told him not to get physical, but this was the second straight election in which Republicans had sent out people to intellectually rough up the voters. The project even had a name: Operation Eagle Eye.

CONTINUED…

OLD LINK BROKE: http://old.post-gazette.com/columnists/20001202roddy.asp

ARCHIVED: https://web.archive.org/web/20141025223026/http://old.post-gazette.com/columnists/20001202roddy.asp



The KKKort serves out two types of Just-Us: for Them and to us.






displacedvermoter

(4,921 posts)
9. The Federalist Society has been grooming these bastards for a generation now, since law school
Thu May 7, 2026, 09:24 AM
Yesterday

UpInArms

(55,272 posts)
2. Fuck yourself Creep Justice Roberts
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:50 AM
Yesterday

When all your rightwing buddies on the bench bring 13th century law into the court to justify misogyny, explain how that works in 21st century USA, since our constitution was written in the 18th century, overruling all laws prior to it.

Quit gaslighting, you wretched excuse for a human

Lovie777

(23,548 posts)
3. 6 assholes in the US SC.....................
Thu May 7, 2026, 08:50 AM
Yesterday

are against freedom, Democracy, rights..................

they are hateful racists.

Omnipresent

(7,506 posts)
6. Sorry John, we're not buying it.
Thu May 7, 2026, 09:12 AM
Yesterday

If you have to verbalize a contradiction to how your court behaves and this of course, bothers you enough to bring it up, then maybe you should resign.

Bettie

(19,829 posts)
10. Well, when opinion after opinion is
Thu May 7, 2026, 09:30 AM
Yesterday

specifically tailored to a specific goal or set of goals, then it isn't the opinions, it is the judges who hold and write those opinions.

When he says "It's a free country", I think he means "it's a free country until I get around to changing that, with my obvious non-activism".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Roberts explains tha...