General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Republicans Dragged Hillary Clinton Back Into the Spotlight. They're Going to Regret It."
Republicans Dragged Hillary Clinton Back Into the Spotlight. Theyre Going to Regret It
https://www.thedailybeast.com/republicans-dragged-hillary-clinton-back-into-the-spotlight-theyre-going-to-regret-it/
If youve noticed Hillary Clinton everywhere again, its not because she has launched a comeback tour. Its because Republicans still just cannot quit her. Despite the fact that she is not mentioned in the Epstein files, House Oversight Chair James Comer has subpoenaed her to testify today. (Her husband, Bill Clinton, will testify tomorrow.) It seems Republicans believe that Clinton can provide a distractionor at least a new punching bagin the scandal that has dogged the Trump administration for months.
They will surely use the closed-door deposition to rehash and revive as much Hillary hate as they can, regurgitating the greatest hits from 2016 and beyond. And theyll certainly air all their attack lines publicly right afterwards.
Still, in forcing Clinton back into the spotlight, Republicans may have accidentally handed Democrats a gift.
Clinton has largely kept a disciplined distance from the churn of politics since her presidential run a decade ago (aside from carefully curated moments, like her speech at the 2024 Democratic National Convention). Though supportive of a variety of organizing efforts through her Onward Together initiative, she did not try to become a resistance mascot. She has not inserted herself into every Trump controversy.
Jim__
(15,151 posts)will leak select, edited sound bites.
I hope the Democrats are ready with responses to whatever the republicans might say.
I don't think that Congress can prevent her from discussing her testimony, and I expect to see her on all the late night programs within the next week.
It is not as if she would be betraying any classified information. She isn't mentioned in the files. She can't recall ever meeting Epstein. She says she was never on him plan, his island, or any of his houses. IN short, there is no purpose for calling her, and she is surely free to discuss all of that publicly.
Hey Joe
(538 posts)Embarrassing himself with his toothless
inquisitions .
His time would be better spent on doing the actual job of improving the lives of his constituents instead of being Trumps fluffer.
I know. Thats just delusional thinking, right?
usonian
(24,472 posts)blue-wave
(4,865 posts)given Hillary a platform. If she chooses to use it or not, I support her either way.
ihaveaquestion
(4,587 posts)Because, apparently, the wives of men mentioned in the Epstein files are fair game.
MLWR
(955 posts)She'll eat them alive and they don't want anyone to see their humiliation. But of course, they just HAD to subpoena her just to harrass her..
Mblaze
(961 posts)Cirsium
(3,771 posts)Why oh why agree to closed door hearings? A closed door hearing is not a hearing!
charliea
(327 posts)Apparently Bobert broke the rules of a closed hearing, and sent a picture of her testifying to "Benny Johnson" a Texan RW "influencer". Who breathlessly published it. According to NYT Hillary halted the deposition then...
More popcorn!
popsdenver
(2,058 posts)Hell....... they were even still dragging Carter in the dirt in an article a few weeks ago...........
It truly is like a constant nightmare that we can't wake up from...............
returnee
(892 posts)Um guess what? We are reaching the depths of desperation.