Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stargleamer

(2,671 posts)
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 07:46 PM 8 hrs ago

an interesting hypothesis on why the word "don't" was redacted in the Epstein files. . .

They looked for “Don T” in the Epstein files and redacted all instances, which means they also redacted a lot of “don’t”

God (@thegodpodcast.com) 2026-02-07T19:56:55.630Z
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
an interesting hypothesis on why the word "don't" was redacted in the Epstein files. . . (Original Post) Stargleamer 8 hrs ago OP
That's some Sherlock Holmes-level detective work. Impressive. TheRickles 8 hrs ago #1
Yep. bamagal62 8 hrs ago #2
Sure makes sense to me. lamp_shade 8 hrs ago #3
You'd think those idiots canetoad 8 hrs ago #4
There should be a law that whoever... Mark.b2 8 hrs ago #5
"Dwigt" has entered the chat Orrex 6 hrs ago #6
Duh JoseBalow 6 hrs ago #7
Darwin Award nominees, all of them. ms liberty 5 hrs ago #8
Seriously, is AI doing the redactions? Talitha 5 hrs ago #9

Mark.b2

(783 posts)
5. There should be a law that whoever...
Sat Feb 7, 2026, 08:21 PM
8 hrs ago

approves a redaction shall be disclosed in the document in which the redaction occurs for each redaction. EACH instance of redaction shall be given a unique identifier along with a justification. Further, the approver of such redactions shall be potentially subject to inquiry about each redaction identified in the event a court or Congress demands explanation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»an interesting hypothesis...