Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(39,161 posts)
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 03:16 PM 17 hrs ago

BREAKING: Supreme Court DENIES Trump's emergency appeal to send National Guard troops into Illinois against the wishes

BREAKING: Supreme Court DENIES Trump’s emergency appeal to send National Guard troops into Illinois against the wishes of local officials

Apparent 6-3 ruling with Alito, Thomas and Gorsuch in dissent @courthousenews.bsky.social

Kelsey Reichmann (@kelseyreichmann.bsky.social) 2025-12-23T20:12:44.563Z

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Supreme Court DENIES Trump's emergency appeal to send National Guard troops into Illinois against the wishes (Original Post) demmiblue 17 hrs ago OP
So much winning! Kaleva 17 hrs ago #1
Fuck Your Emergency Appeals BOSSHOG 17 hrs ago #2
Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #3
From Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker: LetMyPeopleVote 14 hrs ago #4

LetMyPeopleVote

(174,270 posts)
3. Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 03:40 PM
16 hrs ago

The Trump administration says troops are needed to protect immigration agents in the Chicago area, a move that local officials strongly object to.



https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-trump-bid-deploy-national-guard-illinois-rcna238630

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials.

The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.

In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administration’s view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.

Those circumstances can include when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” or “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

Among the issues in the case is what the term “regular forces” means, something the Supreme Court focused on in an order issued on Oct. 29 asking for additional briefing. The question is whether the law only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order, or whether the phrase refers to law enforcement.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: Supreme Court ...