General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRe- the Shutdown, my 2 cents:
I think the Dems need to consistently emphasize that although both parties are basically holding the poor hostage (re- SNAP), Dems are doing it to try to SAVE affordable health care, while Repubs are doing it to try to END affordable health care.
(I just got an email from my Dem congresscritter in which that fact wasn't even mentioned.)
BeerBarrelPolka
(2,173 posts)Who do you think is fighting for the emergency funds?
Brother Buzz
(39,476 posts)snot
(11,412 posts)an argument based on the underlying issue is more compelling; plus it doesn't evaporate if the stalemate continues after the emergency fund has been used up.
mr715
(2,538 posts)The Democrats are not a majority party in either chamber of Congress. They aren't under any obligation to govern. This is because the Republicans don't have the votes. They didn't count the votes.
Democrats own none of this. The ONLY benefit of not being in power is you are protected from claims of governance.
snot
(11,412 posts)If one is talking to fellow Dems, sure, the emergency fund is the best solution in the short term; and I hope that even our current SCOTUS would agree that the refusal to use it is unlawful.
But as far as I know, the main reason the Dems haven't approved the new budget is because it slashes the ACA subsidies -- am I wrong about that? -- and thus, from the point of view of Independents or Republicans who might be reachable, it's a simple matter of logic that if the Dems in Congress caved on slashing the ACA subsidies, the the stalemate would end so from their point of view, the Dems are just as responsible for the shut-down as the Republicans.
The difference that I think could matter to them is the reason why the Dems are holding out and the Republicans are refusing to compromise.
lame54
(39,089 posts)It's the Epstein shutdown