Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFirst-Ever Ban on Surveillance Pricing Introduced in Congress

Just a year ago, the Prospect published a special issue that introduced the term surveillance pricing, which refers to the emerging practice of companies using Americans personal information to set individualized prices, exploiting the desire to buy a particular good. If a business knows when you deposited your paycheck, they might hike up prices on you to capitalize on the money jingling in your pocket; if Uber knows your phone battery is low, they might charge more for a ride because you have to get home before your phone dies.
Within a month, the Federal Trade Commission had initiated a study of surveillance pricing; within a few more months, lawmakers in several states had introduced legislation to ban the practice. And today, the first federal surveillance pricing ban has been introduced, with an added measure that would ban the use of surveillance in setting wages.
Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, is introducing the Stop AI Price Gouging and Wage Fixing Act of 2025. It would simply outlaw using automated processes to offer customized prices based on surveillance data. Differences based on reasonable costs for a particular region would be allowed, as well as discounts for broadly defined groups like seniors or veterans or members of a loyalty program. But using personal data to target individual prices would be prohibited.
We already know that our data is being sucked up, but people always ask what corporations are doing with all that data, Casar said in an interview. This is the clear place that theyre going to go price-gouging and wage-fixing through surveillance is already prevalent in the economy, and if we dont ban it soon, it could be a wildfire that spreads.
Within a month, the Federal Trade Commission had initiated a study of surveillance pricing; within a few more months, lawmakers in several states had introduced legislation to ban the practice. And today, the first federal surveillance pricing ban has been introduced, with an added measure that would ban the use of surveillance in setting wages.
Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, is introducing the Stop AI Price Gouging and Wage Fixing Act of 2025. It would simply outlaw using automated processes to offer customized prices based on surveillance data. Differences based on reasonable costs for a particular region would be allowed, as well as discounts for broadly defined groups like seniors or veterans or members of a loyalty program. But using personal data to target individual prices would be prohibited.
We already know that our data is being sucked up, but people always ask what corporations are doing with all that data, Casar said in an interview. This is the clear place that theyre going to go price-gouging and wage-fixing through surveillance is already prevalent in the economy, and if we dont ban it soon, it could be a wildfire that spreads.
https://prospect.org/economy/2025-07-23-first-ever-ban-surveillance-pricing-congress-greg-casar/
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

First-Ever Ban on Surveillance Pricing Introduced in Congress (Original Post)
justaprogressive
Thursday
OP
leftstreet
(36,896 posts)1. DURec
Baitball Blogger
(50,591 posts)2. Wouldn't that also stop plane ticket pricing
Based on AIs ability to determine how much you can afford?
Doesnt take a genius to figure out that they can also establish preferred customer groups to intentionally give them under priced costs.
OC375
(141 posts)3. EULA?
I'm sure vendors will try to work something into EULA's which sign away any protections we get, just like we all agree to not sue Apple and MS, use arbitration, not hold liable for whatever, etc... when we click all those "I agree" buttons as we consume products and services. Hopefully there is something to stop that.