General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRobt. Reich: Leave it to the Democratic Party to snatch an existential crisis from the jaws of electoral victory.
https://robertreich.substack.com/p/the-corporate-democrats-biggest-nightmare?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon
The Corporate Democrats Biggest Nightmare
Hes on the way to becoming mayor of New York City
ROBERT REICH
JUN 27, 2025
Friends,
Leave it to the Democratic Party to snatch an existential crisis from the jaws of electoral victory.
The stunning success of 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist, in the race for New York City mayor is causing anguish in the Democratic Party.
Its one thing for Trump to call Mamdani a 100% Communist Lunatic. Thats to be expected from the vulgarian-in-chief. Its another for Matt Bennett, co-founder of the centrist Democratic group Third Way, to warn that Mamdanis affiliation with the (Democratic Socialists of America) is very dangerous.
Dangerous for whom? Bernie Sanders nearly won the Democratic primary for the 2016 presidential election after announcing he was a democratic socialist and probably would have won had the Democratic National Committee not torpedoed him.
Lawrence Summers, treasury secretary under former Democratic President Barack Obama, says the New York City results make him profoundly alarmed about the future of the (Democratic Party) and the country.
Well, Im profoundly alarmed, too by just this kind of vacuous statement. If polls are to be believed, the current Democratic Party doesnt have much of a future. Mamdani and other young politicians with the charisma to connect with the people and a willingness to take on corporate America and Wall Street may be the only way forward for the Democrats.
More

Passages
(3,102 posts)https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/3/1/hauser-summers-corporate-ties/
Bluetus
(1,229 posts)They are not equally terrible, but we can't save our democracy without purging the problems in our own party.. The GOP is a lost cause. We can still do something about the Dems.
Montauk6
(9,154 posts)Now I knows Larry Graham, Larry Fine, Larry Bird, Larry Tate, Larry from the Floaters, but I doesn't knows any Larry SUMMERS!
Passages
(3,102 posts)Escurumbele
(3,826 posts)into the Democratic party. Democrats will not win elections unless they start uniting and doing what republicans do, they support each other, no matter how horrible they are, that is one of their best strategies, they have one voice, they even sound like parrots spewing the same hate and lies almost verbatim. One message, they use the strategy of "if you repeat a lie many times it becomes a truth in the minds of your followers".
It is so infuriating.
elleng
(139,954 posts)may be the only way forward for the Democrats.
walkingman
(9,475 posts)going in the wrong direction to me.
Raven123
(6,803 posts)Envirogal
(214 posts)He helped deregulate the old guard financial regulations that held things together by keeping a cement wall between boring, stable banking and the casino of investment banking. My former congressman, Jim Leach of Iowa even has his name on the bill, Grahamm, LEACH, Bliley Act that did away with Glass-Steagel. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/larry-summers-s-legacy/344091/
My favorite memory of Summers is his creepy face when Jon Stewart annihilated him in an interview.
BurnDoubt
(737 posts)"I don't know, but I've been told
it's hard to run with the weight of Gold...
Other hand I've heard it said:
It's just as hard with the weight of Lead."
...Who else is generating that much enthusiasm among the people who will have to live with these decisions for WAY longer than I will.
"Lead, Follow, Or Get Out Of The Way."
Beck23
(395 posts)Apparently, the Democratic party is not a big tent after all.
Grins
(8,542 posts)Win or lose - VOTERS have told you plenty.
As someone once said, Elections have consequences.
Aviation Pro
(14,484 posts)Was nominated.
yardwork
(67,007 posts)PatrickforB
(15,239 posts)KPN
(16,734 posts)bucolic_frolic
(51,132 posts)We can't raise enough corporate cash to compete.
We can't get a fair shake from M$M.
Our own donations don't buy the coverage we need.
We have a Senate problem of long duration.
We have a Court problem.
I doubt socialism and its candidates will turn the trick for us.
Find the flaws and opportunities that I don't see.
AZProgressive
(29,671 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 27, 2025, 08:36 PM - Edit history (1)
He couldn't effectively defend the party nor effectively attack Trump on winnable issues. Kamala Harris was able to do that more so its more of a draw, Kamala won the debate and helped close the gap from Biden's poll numbers before he dropped out.
Also Obama was very charismatic even if I didn't agree with a lot of his policies he was able to make a convincing argument.
I think the young progressives can raise a lot of grassroots donations. Mamdani still won even though he was outspent by at least 10-1.
I think the courts will be conservative for generations--the best we can hope for is to nominate enough Democratic Presidents to try to make up for it but I don't see a solution here whether it is coming from the moderate or progressive wing.
They won't get a fair shake from the MSM but most people are turning to alternative and independent forms of media so it is better to compete on that playing field.
I think the young progressives can boost turnout and do better with young people than third way kind of politics.
returnee
(588 posts)nor the hypothetical benefits of democratic socialism can solve the problem. Am I correct? Do you have another way in mind?
BaronChocula
(2,909 posts)Blame Bennett and Summers and stop shitting on the Democratic Party. There is support among many Democrats for Mamdani. If you support the nominee, you should be amplifying those voices instead of calling the milquetoast wing "the Democratic Party." It gives that faction more power than they deserve.
Just my opinion.
Oopsie Daisy
(6,063 posts)... to be the most pessimistic voice in the room, and always looking for the negative. Sigh. C'mon, Bob!
IrishBubbaLiberal
(2,418 posts)Oopsie Daisy
(6,063 posts)C'mon Bob.
returnee
(588 posts)the knee jerk negativism of Gilibrand, regarding the democratic party hierarchys response to more progressive approaches. I see both negativism and hypocrisy. It seems clear to me her underlying purpose is to support Cuomo (dont even try to tell me otherwise), one more legacy democrat, plus being abusive toward women. No surprise that Bill Clinton was backing him too. So Franken had to be removed from the Senate for a playful comedic photo op, but Cuomo gets a pass?
stillcool
(34,370 posts)it's almost like they've got a cheat sheet with bullet points, changing a few words here and there and slapping their name on it. Same bs over and over. Opinions up the ying-yang, but narrow opinions at that. Guess there is nothing else to write about.
JHB
(37,756 posts)Ford_Prefect
(8,403 posts)rather than facing the realities of a planet on the edge of extinction.
Figarosmom
(6,563 posts)By running independent. The Republican candidate will be.
maxrandb
(16,646 posts)They could split the vote "10 ways to Sunday" and Curtis still would lose by 40% of the vote.
"Sell crazy somewhere else....we're all stocked up here"
Figarosmom
(6,563 posts)And if trump says vote for him , they will. He got over 27 % last time he ran. This time the Dem vote will be split 3 ways all " red berate " needs to do is a few more percentage points. If he has trumps backing , who knows?
AZProgressive
(29,671 posts)Mamdani would likely get all the liberal voters that don't like Cuomo or Adams. It is a closer race with all 3 in but I don't see the Republican Sliwa winning as he usually isn't treated as a serious candidate plus Democrats outnumber Republicans in the city maybe 8-2 or 9-1.
returnee
(588 posts)Whats clear, however, is the opportunistic and morally bankrupt cynicism of both the Cuomo and Adams camps.
fujiyamasan
(350 posts)Will tip this to Mamdani. They will likely split the anti Mamdani vote.
Silwa is a non starter. There just arent enough republicans and republican leaning independents for him to win.
Dan
(4,788 posts)I prefer to die fighting than living on our knees getting screwed.
If that means the Nation splits into two or three pieces, then so be it. Seems like a nation split apart that would make MAGA happy, the GOP happy and the only one sad - are the Democratic members who are being screwed.
We're in a bad marriage and each day it's getting worse. The GOP says that if you're in a bad marriage and the spouse is beating your ass, well that's too bad, you have to stay in the marriage and suffer the abuse. I say when you're tired of getting your ass beat like a drum, do something. I'll leave turning the other cheek to the ones that end up with nice words being said over them and them comforting the abusive spouse who's upset because he/she has no one to beat anymore.
chouchou
(2,070 posts)They hear "Democratic Socialists" and they freak-out thinking:
1950s Soviet Union, communist ideology, and Soviet socialism, Khrushchev, decision-making consumer goods.
I love the people in the USA ....and at the same time, I'm pissed off about their God-Damn stupidity.
Beck23
(395 posts)Social Security.
Medicare.
Medicaid.
Etc
Just Jerome
(234 posts)would you expect from Third Way?
GiqueCee
(2,434 posts)... they are rotten to the very core of their being, and it's all they know how to do. But having Republican shitweasels call for the revocation of his citizenship for NO FUCKING REASON other than the fact that he's not white, is a new low, even for those assholes.
And for the low-wattage intellects that haunt my beloved DU, socialism means that one cares more about people than about greedy corporations and even greedier oligarchs. If you have a problem with that, then you're not worth knowing.
I will refrain from sharing my opinion of those who parrot right-wing criticisms of Mr. Mamdani.
beemerphill
(569 posts)Sometimes, Democrats forget a significant aspect of politics. If the other side wins, you have given up the chance to change the issues to your advantage. When we torpedo our candidates, it just makes everything easier for someone else to win. When a candidate espouses some of our core values and is gaining traction, let him win. After he is in, there is a chance for change. If we sabotage him, we have NO chance whatsoever.
Another way we mess up badly is to push a losing issue, knowing that it will lose the race for us. Some issues are important, but it might be better to keep your trap shut until AFTER the win to push your views.