General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGavin Newsom Sues Fox News For 787 Million For Defamation
Does that number sound familiar?
By John Amato June 27, 2025
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is suing Fox News for $787 million for defamation, after Fox host Jesse Watters claimed the governor lied about a phone call he had with Trump.
Newsom is taking a page out of Trump's litigious playbook, but the governor has an actual case.
https://crooksandliars.com/2025/06/gavin-newsom-sues-fox-news-787-million
Ah yes Dominion case..................

LetMyPeopleVote
(165,576 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 27, 2025, 03:34 PM - Edit history (1)
The Democratic governor is seeking more than $787 million and if that figure sounds at all familiar, theres a good reason for that.
Californiaâs Gavin Newsom sues Fox News, seeking a very specific amount of money.
— Bubbajonz (@bubbajonz.bsky.social) 2025-06-27T18:16:18.640Z
www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/gavin-newsom-fox-news-defamation-lawsuit-rcna215573
California Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against Fox News on Friday, accusing host Jesse Watters of defamation by falsely claiming that Newsom had lied about a phone call with President Donald Trump during a dispute over the use of the National Guard in Los Angeles. The lawsuit ... claims that Fox operates as a propaganda machine for President Trumps radical right-wing agenda.
Politico was first to report on the suit.
The Democratic governor is seeking more than $787 million and if that seemingly unusual figure sounds at all familiar, its because thats roughly the amount of money the network paid in 2023 to settle a defamation case filed by Dominion Voting System.
Or put another way, Newsom and his lawyers engaged in a bit of political trolling when they chose this specific dollar amount.
By disregarding basic journalistic ethics in favor of malicious propaganda, Fox continues to play a major role in the further erosion of the bedrock principles of informed representative government, the lawsuit states. Setting the record straight and confronting Foxs dishonest practices are critical to protecting democracy from being overrun by disinformation and lies......
In reality, the governor didnt say that Trump never called him; he said Trumps claim about a June 9 call was wrong, and on that point, the president himself soon after conceded that Newsom was correct.
If Fox News fails to issue a formal retraction and on-air apology, we will proceed with the lawsuit so that a jury can determine Fox Newss culpability and assign a monetary value to its blatantly unethical conduct, the governors lawyers Michael Teter and Mark Bankson wrote in a letter.
Fox added in a statement of its own: Gov. Newsoms transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him. We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed.
As a legal matter, Newsom faces a tough challenge. As Politicos report noted, Public officials must clear an extremely high legal standard to prevail in defamation cases, as the U.S. Supreme Court established six decades ago in New York Times v. Sullivan.
I have known Mark since before he went to law school. I am still in contact with Susan Bankston (Mark's mom) who told me that there is some juicy stuff in the pleadings. This will be fun to watch
turbinetree
(26,287 posts)Obeidallah tonight and this ruling is really messed up...........he laid it out how the maga in power now talk about Unitarian Executive privilege and this ruling just about will hinder every person in this country to file a suit unless it is class action because of the costs. But he basically said that what has happened in 5 months took Orban 15 years................we are basically going to the authoritarian break through................the amendments will now be under attack............