Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quixote1818

(30,996 posts)
Wed Jun 25, 2025, 11:00 PM Wednesday

On the robotaxis and Tesla vs Waymo. Once self driving tech is available in most cars, can't any Uber driver offer

their car to be used and just not have them in it? Where is the moat for Tesla and Waymo in this regard? It's all going to depend on that tech to get to a point people trust it but I don't see how any company can have a corner on that market.

Am I missing something?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the robotaxis and Tesla vs Waymo. Once self driving tech is available in most cars, can't any Uber driver offer (Original Post) Quixote1818 Wednesday OP
Mostly economy of scale and network effects EdmondDantes_ Wednesday #1
It'll be a long time before most cars have it. tinrobot Wednesday #2
That the owners of these vehicles are willing to pay $150k/year on a gimmick... Hugin Thursday #5
Liability insurance for when your "self driving" machine flvegan Wednesday #3
Passenger acceptance will take time mainer Thursday #4

EdmondDantes_

(553 posts)
1. Mostly economy of scale and network effects
Wed Jun 25, 2025, 11:13 PM
Wednesday

A big company can more easily afford to buy in bulk, to cover the loss of a vehicle, to have their car available at peak times, and having enough users to make it worth the risk of damage and increased insurance etc. In theory someone could make the Fivr of car rental to get around the network issue, but then they have to get the funding to get that going and you're adding in a middleman cutting the profits.

tinrobot

(11,603 posts)
2. It'll be a long time before most cars have it.
Wed Jun 25, 2025, 11:14 PM
Wednesday

The equipment on a Waymo is about $250K. Plus, there's a lot of back end computing power and people needed to support it. Even so, they're limited to driving only in certain areas that are well-mapped. It's going to take a while before they drive everywhere and are cheap enough for anyone to buy.

Tesla's solution is pretty pathetic in comparison, not even close to competing.

As for what happens when the technology is cheap enough so everyone can have it? At that point, we might have to completely rework how we do transportation. Good chance people might put their cars to work as taxis. And, with a glut of taxis, other people might not buy a car at all.

Plus, most cars spend 80% or more of their time parked. If those cars are always "working", then it could add a lot more vehicles to the road. You could be in a traffic jam where only half the cars are occupied.

Hugin

(36,355 posts)
5. That the owners of these vehicles are willing to pay $150k/year on a gimmick...
Thu Jun 26, 2025, 07:59 AM
Thursday

To avoid paying someone $30K/year to drive a taxi shows the breathtaking levels of contempt held against other Americans.

flvegan

(65,099 posts)
3. Liability insurance for when your "self driving" machine
Wed Jun 25, 2025, 11:33 PM
Wednesday

mows down a few children before crashing into a hospital, bursting into flames and destroying everything.

Ahem, uh, I mean I'm sure Tesla will get their shit together some decade from now. I don't know that Waymo is up for that challenge.

mainer

(12,352 posts)
4. Passenger acceptance will take time
Thu Jun 26, 2025, 07:45 AM
Thursday

I ordered an Uber and was offered a Waymo, which would get there 8 minutes earlier. No thanks, I said. The idea of getting locked in a driverless car was too scary.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On the robotaxis and Tesl...