Iran warned of sleeper-cell terror in U.S. before nuclear strikes - NBC News

[yellow dahlia]

NBC News has learned that Iran sent a message to President Trump at the G7 summit that if he ordered strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, then Iran could activate sleeper cells in the U.S. to launch terror attacks, according to two U.S. officials. President Trump said the U.S. strikes ‘completely obliterated’ Iran’s nuclear program. NBC News’ Peter Alexander reports. Here is a link:
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/u-s-officials-iran-threatened-terror-attacks-inside-u-s-242058821681

And I also located a print article from BNO News. Here are some excerpts and an archived link below.

Iran warned President Donald Trump days before the strikes that it would activate sleeper-cell terror in the United States if its nuclear facilities were targeted, according to NBC News.

The communiqué was delivered through an intermediary during last week’s G7 summit in Canada, which Trump left early, according to NBC News, citing two U.S. officials and a person with direct knowledge of the message.

According to the bulletin, if Iranian leaders were to issue a religious ruling, or fatwa, calling for retaliation, it could increase the likelihood of violence from regime supporters within the U.S.

The bulletin also warned that Iranian-linked hacktivists are likely to conduct low-level cyberattacks against U.S. networks, while more sophisticated operations could be carried out by cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government

https://archive.ph/nyhue

*************************************************************************

I have uttered the word motherfucker dozens of times in the past twenty-four hours.

[Prairie Gates]

1. Counterpoint: there are no such things a "sleeper cells," which are an extremely goofy

fictional invention.

[Jack Valentino]

13. Like the fictional sleeper cells which struck on 9-11.... right?

[ShazzieB]

17. Are you absolutely sure about that?

Do you have a source to back up this claim?

If not, please pardon me for being skeptical.

[ananda]

2. How well would terror attacks fit in with the Trump/Republican agenda?

I'm trying to imagine how they'd react.

I'm not used to this level of chaos and horror, not even
with Dubya.

[newdeal2]

3. Crackdown on all protests

Ram through their terrible bills.

MAGA will say you’re either with us or against us.

All bad things for Dems.

[ananda]

6. That would seem logical according to the 2025 agenda..

Only every aspect of life is already under attack...
healthcare, the food system, business management,
all social safety nets, and the bizarre need to eliminate
all "immigrants" from the country.

And I think I just touched the surface.

So if nothing about ordinary, everyday life is working,
what would happen if that were already dysfunctional
or destroyed?

[AntiFascist]

5. Declaration of martial law? n/t

[yellow dahlia]

7. Seriously! n/t

[moonscape]

16. He'd tell his base they're coming from

the radical left nd his base will believe it.

[ananda]

18. Something like calling them antifa would fit that mo.

Indeed

[UpInArms]

4. I called it last night

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20419880

[stillcool]

8. says who?

crickets.

[debsy]

9. I don't ever believe a word out of this "administration". They are all liars.

According to Lev Parnas, that is a ruse they are using to scare people.

https://levremembers.substack.com/p/while-the-media-chases-trumps-distractions]

Not that I believe everything Lev Parnas has to say but I believe he wrote this before the story broke on “sleeper cells”.

[femmedem]

10. I'm worried about cyber attacks on our power grid during the heatwave. n/t

[yellow dahlia]

12. Good point. I have been worried about assaults on our power grid for awhile.

[MorbidButterflyTat]

11. Which is it?

"Iran warned...days before the strikes that it would activate sleeper-cell terror in the United States if its nuclear facilities were targeted..."

OR:

"According to the bulletin, if Iranian leaders were to issue a religious ruling, or fatwa, calling for retaliation, it could increase the likelihood of violence from regime supporters within the U.S."

So either they would do it, or it could increase the likelihood that they would do it...those are two very different statements.

"...citing two U.S. officials and a person with direct knowledge of the message."

Who? Name names, what's so secret? Why so coy? Iran should know what the message said, and the fugly felon's culty administration knows, so why not identify themselves? It doesn't say they spoke on condition of anonymity, like usual, so spill!

Lying criminals.

[RedWhiteBlueIsRacist]

14. We have a fucking terrorist running the country. Sorry, but Iranian sleeper-cells are going to have to take a number.

[OC375]

15. Sleep Cells?

If these Sleep Cells actually exist, then it was a problem long bofre we bombed their peaceful nuclear weapons program. Not bombing Iran doesn't diffuse them.

[BannonsLiver]

19. If/when there is a retaliatory attack in the U.S. hopefully Democrats can do a better job of setting the narrative

And that narrative is Trump, Noem, Whiskey Pete the DUI hire and the small child running DHS anti terrorism failed to protect American citizens. Should be repeated over and over again - they dropped the ball bigly. It shouldn’t be kumbaya shit. Treat him like they would have treated Biden under the same scenario.

[yellow dahlia]

20. Agreed