Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(88,793 posts)
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 10:00 AM 10 hrs ago

White House security staff warned Musk's Starlink is a security risk

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/06/07/starlink-white-house-security-doge-musk/

White House security staff warned Musk’s Starlink is a security risk
Starlink satellite connections in the White House bypass controls meant to stop leaks and hacking.
June 7, 2025 at 7:00 a.m. EDT
By Joseph Menn

Elon Musk’s team at the U.S. DOGE Service and allies in the Trump administration ignored White House communications experts worried about potential security breaches when DOGE personnel installed Musk’s Starlink internet service in the complex this year, three people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post.

The people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues, said those who were managing White House communications systems were not informed in advance when DOGE representatives went to the roof of the adjacent Eisenhower Executive Office Building in February to install a terminal connecting users in the complex to Starlink satellites, which are owned by Musk’s private SpaceX rocket company.

The people said those managing the systems weren’t able to monitor such connections to stop sensitive information from leaving the complex or hackers from breaking in.

It could not be verified whether the rooftop terminal remains installed or if anything would change now that Musk has receded from the government. A “Starlink Guest” WiFi network appeared on White House phones in February, prompting users only for a password, not a username or a second form of authentication, according to the people. That WiFi network was still appearing on White House visitors’ phones this week.

Traditionally at the White House, personal phones on guest WiFi networks need names and passwords that are tracked and expire after a week, the people said. Work computers are locked down with security programs and staffers’ interactions with the outside world are “very thoroughly tracked,” with the device identifiers and times of all transmissions recorded, said one of the people, who left the government after the Starlink installation.

“Starlink doesn’t require anything. It allows you to transmit data without any kind of record or tracking,” this person told The Post. “White House IT systems had very strong controls on network access. You had to be on a full-tunnel VPN at all times. If you are not on the VPN, White House-issued devices can’t connect to the outside.”

...
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

C_U_L8R

(47,437 posts)
1. That and all the burner phones and phony accounts
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 10:02 AM
10 hrs ago

There is no difference between this admin and a (disorganized) criminal racket.

Irish_Dem

(70,479 posts)
4. I think it is a very organized criminal racket.
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 10:07 AM
10 hrs ago

The information and secrets are being sold for a good price.
Or in return for favors.

Wonder Why

(5,828 posts)
5. Duh! Nutcase-owned internet system is unsecure! Only the administration would wait to discover
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 10:17 AM
9 hrs ago

that until now!

cmmngrnd

(18 posts)
7. This is not new info, so maybe a play by the WH to discredit Musk?
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 10:24 AM
9 hrs ago

This administration doesn't care about information security, communication protocol, retaining records, or any idea of process a normal administration would care about.

The lack of security of Starlink and other non-official communication and data channels was known to anyone with a passing idea of normal behavior ("intuitively obvious to a casual observer" is the phrase we used to use).

So why leak this now? Leaks have been used by presidential administrations going back to Washington. in addition to taking in the content of any WH communication, pay attention to the timing.

My guess: It's both a warning to Musk that those big Starlink contracts he is wanting could be removed, and a way to discredit him.

Snarkoleptic

(6,139 posts)
8. The NLRB whistleblower's attorney asserted (on Maddow) that all Starlink traffic goes through Russia.
Sat Jun 7, 2025, 11:50 AM
8 hrs ago
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/4/15/2316718/-A-Whistleblower-at-NLRB-exposes-DOGE-and-data-possibly-going-to-Russia
The other incredible part of the story is that Berulis said the government decided to stop using Starlink because all the data going through it was going to Russia. Rachel said that they couldn't confirm the Russia and Starlink story. That was what Daniel Berulis said on air.


Here's the part of the Maddow interview where the whistleblower's attorney states- (Skip to 5:00)
"The information that flows through Starlink, goes directly to Russia."
?t=300
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House security staf...