Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellow dahlia

(2,475 posts)
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 07:57 PM Yesterday

Can someone please explain federal laws and statutes to SCOTUS.

Last edited Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:46 PM - Edit history (2)

How about the Privacy Act of 1974, to start. AND the Social Security Administration has its own statutory parameters for how it handles the personal information and data of the citizenry.



Update: I added some pertinent articles in my reply (#6) to another commenter.
I feel like I want to say more, but right now I am pretty much apoplectic.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone please explain federal laws and statutes to SCOTUS. (Original Post) yellow dahlia Yesterday OP
Any chance of appeal???? vapor2 Yesterday #1
There had been a TRO that prevented DOGE from having full access at SSA, yellow dahlia 23 hrs ago #6
It isn't a lack of understanding or lack of knowing. They don't care. RockRaven 23 hrs ago #2
Could be a lil bit of self preservation going on too. Elon just might have THEIR private financials too. Attilatheblond 23 hrs ago #3
We all need to realize that Trump's special immunity deal... dchill 23 hrs ago #4
Fuck these partisan hacks LR3 23 hrs ago #5

yellow dahlia

(2,475 posts)
6. There had been a TRO that prevented DOGE from having full access at SSA,
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:43 PM
23 hrs ago

while the case was waiting to be decided on the merits. The grifter and the take over "administration" appealed it to three courts to get the TRO lifted. It even went to an en banc full panel at the Fourth Circuit court, which upheld the TRO. So then the grifter took it to SCOTUS for emergency relief and got it.

So even if the original court eventually finds for the plaintiffs on the merits, how do you put that Genie back in the bottle? IT is a major betrayal from SCOTUS again.

I am not sure if I explained it well, so here are a couple of articles explaining it better than me.
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/06/nx-s1-5422283/supreme-court-doge-social-security-records

This is the ruling, including the dissent from Justice Jackson.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1063_6j37.pdf

This article is about the decision of the full panel at the Fourth Circuit.
https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/court-documents/court-opinions-and-orders/full-fourth-circuit-denies-stay-doge-ssa-access-injunction/7s4c4

RockRaven

(17,335 posts)
2. It isn't a lack of understanding or lack of knowing. They don't care.
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:04 PM
23 hrs ago

They exercise power how they wish without regard to facts or arguments, except on occasion as window-dressing but certainly never anything to be constrained by.

Attilatheblond

(6,120 posts)
3. Could be a lil bit of self preservation going on too. Elon just might have THEIR private financials too.
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:11 PM
23 hrs ago
'Nice lifetime appointment you have there. It'd be a pity if some damaging information forced you out of that cushy job!'

dchill

(42,506 posts)
4. We all need to realize that Trump's special immunity deal...
Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:18 PM
23 hrs ago

...also applies to the Cons on SCOTUS. For as long as they live.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone please explai...