General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan someone please explain federal laws and statutes to SCOTUS.
Last edited Fri Jun 6, 2025, 08:46 PM - Edit history (2)
How about the Privacy Act of 1974, to start. AND the Social Security Administration has its own statutory parameters for how it handles the personal information and data of the citizenry.
Update: I added some pertinent articles in my reply (#6) to another commenter.
I feel like I want to say more, but right now I am pretty much apoplectic.

vapor2
(2,478 posts)yellow dahlia
(2,475 posts)while the case was waiting to be decided on the merits. The grifter and the take over "administration" appealed it to three courts to get the TRO lifted. It even went to an en banc full panel at the Fourth Circuit court, which upheld the TRO. So then the grifter took it to SCOTUS for emergency relief and got it.
So even if the original court eventually finds for the plaintiffs on the merits, how do you put that Genie back in the bottle? IT is a major betrayal from SCOTUS again.
I am not sure if I explained it well, so here are a couple of articles explaining it better than me.
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/06/nx-s1-5422283/supreme-court-doge-social-security-records
This is the ruling, including the dissent from Justice Jackson.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a1063_6j37.pdf
This article is about the decision of the full panel at the Fourth Circuit.
https://www.taxnotes.com/research/federal/court-documents/court-opinions-and-orders/full-fourth-circuit-denies-stay-doge-ssa-access-injunction/7s4c4
RockRaven
(17,335 posts)They exercise power how they wish without regard to facts or arguments, except on occasion as window-dressing but certainly never anything to be constrained by.
Attilatheblond
(6,120 posts)dchill
(42,506 posts)...also applies to the Cons on SCOTUS. For as long as they live.
LR3
(20 posts)n/t