General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, my financial advisor emails me today...
Obviously to address the tariffs and market decline. It did look like a cut-and-paste that probably went out to all clients.
There's no doubt he's Republican, but he keeps political views to himself. Only with him due to looooooong family history with the firm he is with. He is sharp though.
The email walks the line for the most part to not outright offend left or right clients. BUT, leans into that BS short-term pain, long-term gain speak in "reshaping the economy to adress the federal debt."
There's just no way to navigate concerns, adjustments and strategies without making this poitical. Trump's actions started all this. FULL STOP!

Walleye
(39,407 posts)BOSSHOG
(41,947 posts)Deal with both short and long term pain at the same time. With action and a plan. At least stop the freaking bleeding.
GusBob
(7,832 posts)Glad handlers are good liars
gab13by13
(27,564 posts)The pain was unnecessary, self-imposed by Trump, to show how powerful he is.
Johonny
(23,281 posts)That is almost guaranteed.
DaBronx
(691 posts)I hope he has
Your best interests front of mind. Sounds like he is repeating the Republican talking points. We are going to have severe long term pain from tariffs with no positive outcome! If they dont get rid of these tariffs we are going to be in trouble. Small to medium businesses already talking about cutting back, some shutting down, laying off employees. The only places that are going to do well are the local mechanics. Nobody will be able to afford cars or anything. Parts will be expensive as well. We are going back to hoarding toilet paper soon. Canada has rightfully turned their back on US products and I feel the world will soon follow suit. What a mess.
He didn't make that point directly, instead, saying,
"Although controversial, some economists argue these changes are necessary for addressing federal debt."
That's a bit weasly, but it is factual. Some economists do. Just not the type that any of us would agree with!
Doodley
(10,735 posts)NCDem47
(2,725 posts)He understood. We discussed the pros and cons.
Sooooooo glad I did. Reduced my stock exposure.
Still....a rough past 48 hours and I feel more to come here throughout the day.
Doodley
(10,735 posts)SamuelTheThird
(201 posts)usonian
(16,970 posts)